Figures & data
Figure 1. The improvement of intestinal mucosal permeability. (a) Effects on small intestinal villi; (b) Effects on intestinal tight junction proteins in the intestinal epithelium. C, control group; M, model group; P, positive group; R-l, raw licorice low dose group; R-h, raw licorice high dose group; H-l, honey-roasted licorice low-dose group; H-h, honey-roasted licorice high-dose group. *p < .05, **p < .01 ***p < .001 vs. M; #p < .05, ##p < .01, ###p < .001 R-l vs. H-l, R-h vs. H-h (n = 3).
![Figure 1. The improvement of intestinal mucosal permeability. (a) Effects on small intestinal villi; (b) Effects on intestinal tight junction proteins in the intestinal epithelium. C, control group; M, model group; P, positive group; R-l, raw licorice low dose group; R-h, raw licorice high dose group; H-l, honey-roasted licorice low-dose group; H-h, honey-roasted licorice high-dose group. *p < .05, **p < .01 ***p < .001 vs. M; #p < .05, ##p < .01, ###p < .001 R-l vs. H-l, R-h vs. H-h (n = 3).](/cms/asset/38c7d51c-f59f-4758-89c8-94a969ed28ab/tcyt_a_2193605_f0001_oc.jpg)
Figure 2. The improvement of immune function. C, control group; M, model group; P, positive group; R-l, raw licorice low-dose group; R-h, raw licorice high dose group; H-l, honey-roasted licorice low dose group; H-h, honey-roasted licorice high dose group. *p < .05, **p < .01, ***p < .001 vs. M; #p < .05, ##p < .01, ###p < .001 R-l vs. H-l, R-h vs. H-h (n = 6).
![Figure 2. The improvement of immune function. C, control group; M, model group; P, positive group; R-l, raw licorice low-dose group; R-h, raw licorice high dose group; H-l, honey-roasted licorice low dose group; H-h, honey-roasted licorice high dose group. *p < .05, **p < .01, ***p < .001 vs. M; #p < .05, ##p < .01, ###p < .001 R-l vs. H-l, R-h vs. H-h (n = 6).](/cms/asset/c0cf6ff2-1f7b-4d1d-96e1-617caab757b2/tcyt_a_2193605_f0002_b.gif)
Figure 3. The overall structure of the gut microbiota. (a) PCoA on OUT level of different groups (n = 6). (b) the relative abundance at the phylum level. C, control group; M, model group; R-h, raw licorice high dose group; H-h, honey-roasted licorice high dose group.
![Figure 3. The overall structure of the gut microbiota. (a) PCoA on OUT level of different groups (n = 6). (b) the relative abundance at the phylum level. C, control group; M, model group; R-h, raw licorice high dose group; H-h, honey-roasted licorice high dose group.](/cms/asset/5c9c00e4-2abd-406e-a0e0-d352e1fb7352/tcyt_a_2193605_f0003_oc.jpg)
Figure 4. The composition of gut microbiota (n = 6). (a) Cladogram generated from LEfSe analysis for C, M, R-h, and H-h groups; nonparametric factorial Kruskal-Wallis (KW) sum-rank test, LDA> 3.5, p < .05. (b) Heatmap of gut microbiota at the genus level based on LEfSe analysis results. (c) Group difference analysis of representative intestinal bacteria. (Compared to the M group, *p < .05, **p < .01. Comparison of R-h group and H-h group, #p < .05, ##p < .01). C, control group; M, model group; R-h, raw licorice high-dose group; H-h, honey-roasted licorice high-dose group.
![Figure 4. The composition of gut microbiota (n = 6). (a) Cladogram generated from LEfSe analysis for C, M, R-h, and H-h groups; nonparametric factorial Kruskal-Wallis (KW) sum-rank test, LDA> 3.5, p < .05. (b) Heatmap of gut microbiota at the genus level based on LEfSe analysis results. (c) Group difference analysis of representative intestinal bacteria. (Compared to the M group, *p < .05, **p < .01. Comparison of R-h group and H-h group, #p < .05, ##p < .01). C, control group; M, model group; R-h, raw licorice high-dose group; H-h, honey-roasted licorice high-dose group.](/cms/asset/38e82cd2-666e-4834-bd53-b9779bac24d1/tcyt_a_2193605_f0004_oc.jpg)
Supplemental Material
Download MS Word (146.6 KB)Data availability statement
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.