2,860
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Basic Research Article

Using network analysis to illuminate the intergenerational transmission of adversity

Utilizando el análisis de redes para iluminar la transmisión intergeneracional de la adversidad

用网络分析阐明逆境的代际传递

, ORCID Icon, , , , , & show all
Article: 2101347 | Received 24 Apr 2022, Accepted 01 Jul 2022, Published online: 18 Aug 2022

Figures & data

Figure 1. Network displaying the interrelationships between ACEs, a wide array of prenatal risk factors for preterm birth and low birthweight, and the outcomes of interest. Carnation nodes represent ACEs, purple nodes represent the outcomes, teal nodes indicate biological risks, blue nodes indicate risky behaviours, orange nodes indicate psychosocial risks, green nodes represent environmental risks, and pink nodes represent covariates. Blue edges suggest positive association while red edges (dashed) represent negative associations. Node predictability measures visualised using node rings, with blue rings indicating the proportion of explained variance for continuous nodes while purple rings indicate accuracy of intercept model for dichotomous nodes. The red rings indicate additional accuracy achieved by all remaining variables.

Figure 1. Network displaying the interrelationships between ACEs, a wide array of prenatal risk factors for preterm birth and low birthweight, and the outcomes of interest. Carnation nodes represent ACEs, purple nodes represent the outcomes, teal nodes indicate biological risks, blue nodes indicate risky behaviours, orange nodes indicate psychosocial risks, green nodes represent environmental risks, and pink nodes represent covariates. Blue edges suggest positive association while red edges (dashed) represent negative associations. Node predictability measures visualised using node rings, with blue rings indicating the proportion of explained variance for continuous nodes while purple rings indicate accuracy of intercept model for dichotomous nodes. The red rings indicate additional accuracy achieved by all remaining variables.

Figure 2. Network displaying the interrelationships between ACEs, a wide array of prenatal risk factors for preterm birth and low birthweight, and the outcomes of interest. Carnation nodes represent ACEs, purple nodes represent the outcomes, teal nodes indicate biological risks, blue nodes indicate risky behaviours, orange nodes indicate psychosocial risks, green nodes represent environmental risks, and pink nodes represent covariates. Blue edges suggest positive association while red edges (dashed) represent negative associations. Node predictability measures visualised using node rings, with blue rings indicating the proportion of explained variance for continuous nodes while purple rings indicate accuracy of intercept model for dichotomous nodes. The red rings indicate additional accuracy achieved by all remaining variables.

Figure 2. Network displaying the interrelationships between ACEs, a wide array of prenatal risk factors for preterm birth and low birthweight, and the outcomes of interest. Carnation nodes represent ACEs, purple nodes represent the outcomes, teal nodes indicate biological risks, blue nodes indicate risky behaviours, orange nodes indicate psychosocial risks, green nodes represent environmental risks, and pink nodes represent covariates. Blue edges suggest positive association while red edges (dashed) represent negative associations. Node predictability measures visualised using node rings, with blue rings indicating the proportion of explained variance for continuous nodes while purple rings indicate accuracy of intercept model for dichotomous nodes. The red rings indicate additional accuracy achieved by all remaining variables.

Table 1. Sociodemographic characteristics of the sample (n = 8379).

Supplemental material

Supplemental Material

Download MS Word (552 KB)

Supplemental Material

Download MS Word (2.9 MB)