1,187
Views
18
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Paper

An alternative host model of a mixed fungal infection by azole susceptible and resistant Aspergillus spp strains

, , &
Pages 376-384 | Received 03 Dec 2014, Accepted 25 Feb 2015, Published online: 11 Jun 2015

Figures & data

Table 1. Primers and Probes Sequences designed for the Multiplex Nested Real Time PCR assay.

Figure 1. (A) Survival rate of G. mellonella infected with A. fumigatus (CM-237) or A. lentulus (CM-1290) (105 spores/larvae). Control group (dotted line) represent survival of larvae inoculated with saline only. (B) Histopathology of G. mellonella infected with A. fumigatus and A. lentulus, at different times points of the infection (Day +2 and +4). 20 x magnification, PAS stained. Differences between the A. fumigatus and A. lentulus infection pattern: larvae showed branched invasive hyphal growth of A. fumigatus (steady arrows) while A. lentulus was encapsulated by immune cells (dash arrows).

Figure 1. (A) Survival rate of G. mellonella infected with A. fumigatus (CM-237) or A. lentulus (CM-1290) (105 spores/larvae). Control group (dotted line) represent survival of larvae inoculated with saline only. (B) Histopathology of G. mellonella infected with A. fumigatus and A. lentulus, at different times points of the infection (Day +2 and +4). 20 x magnification, PAS stained. Differences between the A. fumigatus and A. lentulus infection pattern: larvae showed branched invasive hyphal growth of A. fumigatus (steady arrows) while A. lentulus was encapsulated by immune cells (dash arrows).

Figure 2. (A) Killing rate comparison of G. mellonella infected with A. fumigatus with or without VRC treatment. (B) Killing rate comparison of G. mellonella infected with A. lentulus with or without VRC treatment. (C) Fungal burden determination in G. mellonella infected with A. fumigatus (AF) or A. lentulus (AL), untreated (NT) or treated with VRC. Statistical significance by unpaired t test of VRC treated vs. untreated data for each time point is marked as (*P < 0.01 or **P < 0.002).

Figure 2. (A) Killing rate comparison of G. mellonella infected with A. fumigatus with or without VRC treatment. (B) Killing rate comparison of G. mellonella infected with A. lentulus with or without VRC treatment. (C) Fungal burden determination in G. mellonella infected with A. fumigatus (AF) or A. lentulus (AL), untreated (NT) or treated with VRC. Statistical significance by unpaired t test of VRC treated vs. untreated data for each time point is marked as (*P < 0.01 or **P < 0.002).

Figure 3. Histopathology of G. mellonella infected with A. fumigatus and A. lentulus and treated with VRC, at different time points of the infection (Day +2, +4 and +6). 20 x magnification, PAS stained. Upper panel: when the larvae were infected with A. fumigatus and treated with VRC, the fungus was almost cleared with tissues appearing healthy. Lower panel: A. lentulus CM-1290 strain persisted in the tissues with an increase of fungal burden after 4 and 6 d post-infection (black arrows).

Figure 3. Histopathology of G. mellonella infected with A. fumigatus and A. lentulus and treated with VRC, at different time points of the infection (Day +2, +4 and +6). 20 x magnification, PAS stained. Upper panel: when the larvae were infected with A. fumigatus and treated with VRC, the fungus was almost cleared with tissues appearing healthy. Lower panel: A. lentulus CM-1290 strain persisted in the tissues with an increase of fungal burden after 4 and 6 d post-infection (black arrows).

Figure 4. (A) Survival rate of G. mellonella infected with a mixture of A. fumigatus (AF):A. lentulus (AL) (1:1) compared to single infections. (B) Comparative analysis of VRC treated and untreated larvae (This data is the same that was used for ). (C) Fungal burden determination in G. mellonella infected with a mixed inocula of both A. fumigatus and A. lentulus. (D) Fungal burden determination and VRC treatment efficacy in a mixed fungal infection. Statistical significance by unpaired t test of A. fumigatus versus A. lentulus at 6 d is marked as (***P <0.003).

Figure 4. (A) Survival rate of G. mellonella infected with a mixture of A. fumigatus (AF):A. lentulus (AL) (1:1) compared to single infections. (B) Comparative analysis of VRC treated and untreated larvae (This data is the same that was used for Fig. 4A). (C) Fungal burden determination in G. mellonella infected with a mixed inocula of both A. fumigatus and A. lentulus. (D) Fungal burden determination and VRC treatment efficacy in a mixed fungal infection. Statistical significance by unpaired t test of A. fumigatus versus A. lentulus at 6 d is marked as (***P <0.003).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.