Figures & data
Table 1. Strains used in this study.
Figure 1. Morphological, growth and virulence characterization of the parental ExPEC PCN033 strain and the tat mutant (Δtat).
![Figure 1. Morphological, growth and virulence characterization of the parental ExPEC PCN033 strain and the tat mutant (Δtat).](/cms/asset/90b481e4-aa79-4c53-a835-95be45245ed9/kvir_a_1817709_f0001_oc.jpg)
Table 2. Predicted Tat substrates encoded in ExPEC PCN033 genome.
Table 3. Competitive index (n = 5).
Figure 2. Colonization of WT, ΔsufI, and ΔamiAΔamiC strains in mouse.
![Figure 2. Colonization of WT, ΔsufI, and ΔamiAΔamiC strains in mouse.](/cms/asset/62056184-6f16-411c-8613-59e674aefad7/kvir_a_1817709_f0002_b.gif)
Figure 3. In vitro cell adhesion, and whole blood and serum bactericidal assays. (a). In vitro cell adhesion.
![Figure 3. In vitro cell adhesion, and whole blood and serum bactericidal assays. (a). In vitro cell adhesion.](/cms/asset/8630b180-936b-44e4-a64a-44fe2ad3bd3a/kvir_a_1817709_f0003_b.gif)
Figure 4. Motility assay.
![Figure 4. Motility assay.](/cms/asset/9347c071-18bc-40b9-a904-e90b0b54a16b/kvir_a_1817709_f0004_b.gif)
Figure 5. Live cell imaging of WT, Δtat, CΔtat, ΔsufI, and ΔamiAΔamiC strains.
![Figure 5. Live cell imaging of WT, Δtat, CΔtat, ΔsufI, and ΔamiAΔamiC strains.](/cms/asset/5f551c0f-35d4-4d99-9d2e-d7807611de7a/kvir_a_1817709_f0005_oc.jpg)
Figure 6. Stress response assay. (a). SDS resistance.
![Figure 6. Stress response assay. (a). SDS resistance.](/cms/asset/7b061269-d073-4432-b375-405c6b446741/kvir_a_1817709_f0006_b.gif)