Figures & data
Figure 1. Purification and characterisation of C-OPSBa and CTBTri-OPSBa. a) schematic diagram of the process of CTBTri-OPSBa nanovaccine expression in YeO9_52212 cell and vaccination in mice, and the subsequent pathogen challenge in vaccinated mice. b) the plasmid map of pPglL-CTBTri. c) YeO9_52212 was transformed with expression plasmids and then induced with IPTG (0.1 mM), and Coomassie blue staining and western blotting using a 6 × His tag antibody were performed to analyse the glycosylated expression of CTB and CTBTri in YeO9_52212. d) after purification, the C-OPSBa and CTBTri-OPSBa were analysed by Coomassie blue staining, western blotting using anti 6 × His Tag, anti-Y. enterocolitica O:9 (anti Ye), and anti-B. abortus (anti Ba) antibodies. e) TEM image and F) DLS analysis of the purified NP-OPSBa. G) DLS analysis of NP-OPSBa stored at room temperature at different time points.
![Figure 1. Purification and characterisation of C-OPSBa and CTBTri-OPSBa. a) schematic diagram of the process of CTBTri-OPSBa nanovaccine expression in YeO9_52212 cell and vaccination in mice, and the subsequent pathogen challenge in vaccinated mice. b) the plasmid map of pPglL-CTBTri. c) YeO9_52212 was transformed with expression plasmids and then induced with IPTG (0.1 mM), and Coomassie blue staining and western blotting using a 6 × His tag antibody were performed to analyse the glycosylated expression of CTB and CTBTri in YeO9_52212. d) after purification, the C-OPSBa and CTBTri-OPSBa were analysed by Coomassie blue staining, western blotting using anti 6 × His Tag, anti-Y. enterocolitica O:9 (anti Ye), and anti-B. abortus (anti Ba) antibodies. e) TEM image and F) DLS analysis of the purified NP-OPSBa. G) DLS analysis of NP-OPSBa stored at room temperature at different time points.](/cms/asset/0a15b22f-1ad8-4783-af98-30e7f912e321/kvir_a_2280377_f0001_oc.jpg)
Figure 2. Safety evaluation of nanovaccine. a) experimental schedule for the safety evaluation. b) the temperature and weight of normal mice and immunised mice were determined every 3 days after immunisation until the 15th day. c) histological analysis of heart, liver, kidney, lung, and spleen in mice.
![Figure 2. Safety evaluation of nanovaccine. a) experimental schedule for the safety evaluation. b) the temperature and weight of normal mice and immunised mice were determined every 3 days after immunisation until the 15th day. c) histological analysis of heart, liver, kidney, lung, and spleen in mice.](/cms/asset/1a3007e8-dbd3-484b-b6c5-2bd6ff6e2dd5/kvir_a_2280377_f0002_oc.jpg)
Figure 3. Strong antibody response and protection against different Brucella strains induced by NP-OPSBa in mice. a) schematic diagram of titre measurements and the lethal challenge experiment. b) serum IgG antibody titres. c) IgG1 and IgG2a antibody titres against YeO9_52212 LPS after third immunisation. Data are Lg10-transformed and presented as means ± SD and analysed by one-way ANOVA with Dunn’s multiple comparison test: ****p < 0.0001 and **p < 0.01. d) OPS-specific IgG isotype antibody titre IgG1/IgG2a ratios. D) Fourteen days after the third immunisation, the mice were challenged with a lethal dose of E) B. abortus, F) B. melitenesis, or G) B. suis and their survival was monitored for 14 days.
![Figure 3. Strong antibody response and protection against different Brucella strains induced by NP-OPSBa in mice. a) schematic diagram of titre measurements and the lethal challenge experiment. b) serum IgG antibody titres. c) IgG1 and IgG2a antibody titres against YeO9_52212 LPS after third immunisation. Data are Lg10-transformed and presented as means ± SD and analysed by one-way ANOVA with Dunn’s multiple comparison test: ****p < 0.0001 and **p < 0.01. d) OPS-specific IgG isotype antibody titre IgG1/IgG2a ratios. D) Fourteen days after the third immunisation, the mice were challenged with a lethal dose of E) B. abortus, F) B. melitenesis, or G) B. suis and their survival was monitored for 14 days.](/cms/asset/fa27aa86-3472-45fe-8806-95b7f0ec5eb7/kvir_a_2280377_f0003_oc.jpg)
Figure 4. Evaluation of immunised mice following non-lethal doses of Brucella infection. Mice were immunised and infected with a non-lethal dose of B. melitensis following schematic diagram A), then we determined the B) weight (n = 5), C) serum TNF-α (n = 3) of mice, D) bacterial load (n = 5) in the spleen of mice 5 days after infection. Data are presented as means ± SD and analysed by one-way ANOVA with Dunn’s multiple comparison test: ****p < 0.0001, ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, and *p < 0.05.
![Figure 4. Evaluation of immunised mice following non-lethal doses of Brucella infection. Mice were immunised and infected with a non-lethal dose of B. melitensis following schematic diagram A), then we determined the B) weight (n = 5), C) serum TNF-α (n = 3) of mice, D) bacterial load (n = 5) in the spleen of mice 5 days after infection. Data are presented as means ± SD and analysed by one-way ANOVA with Dunn’s multiple comparison test: ****p < 0.0001, ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, and *p < 0.05.](/cms/asset/9fa14f35-dfdb-4a8f-9f0a-0cd5322874e8/kvir_a_2280377_f0004_oc.jpg)
Supplemental Material
Download MS Word (501.5 KB)Data Availability statement
The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its supplementary materials.