268
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Impact of Fertilizers Application on Leaf Litter Decomposition and Nutrient Cycling in White Poplar (Populus alba L.) Forest Ecosystem

, , , , &
Received 15 Mar 2024, Accepted 27 Apr 2024, Published online: 20 May 2024

Figures & data

Figure 1. Map of the study area showing the location of Qadis district, in Badghis province, Afghanistan.

Figure 1. Map of the study area showing the location of Qadis district, in Badghis province, Afghanistan.

Figure 2. Diagram showing the experimental process in white poplar forest in Qadis district

Figure 2. Diagram showing the experimental process in white poplar forest in Qadis district

Figure 3. Effect of various fertilizers on leaf litter decompositions at different sampling times. Values are Mean ± SE.

Figure 3. Effect of various fertilizers on leaf litter decompositions at different sampling times. Values are Mean ± SE.

Table 1. Leaf litter decomposition constant, correlation coefficient, at T50% and T95% decomposition of White poplar leaf litter under various fertilizers. All relationship was significant (***p < 0.001)

Figure 4. The dynamic of Carbon, Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Potassium concentration in leaf litter for treatments during the decomposition process at four sampling times (means ± SE), p < 0.05.

Figure 4. The dynamic of Carbon, Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Potassium concentration in leaf litter for treatments during the decomposition process at four sampling times (means ± SE), p < 0.05.

Figure 5. Dynamic characteristics of soil (SOC, TN, TP, and TK) for treatments during the decomposition process at four sampling times (means ± SE), p < 0.05.

Figure 5. Dynamic characteristics of soil (SOC, TN, TP, and TK) for treatments during the decomposition process at four sampling times (means ± SE), p < 0.05.

Table 2. Comparison of physicochemical characteristics of soil in different fertilizer treatments at white poplar forest at four sampling times. Different lower- case letters within columns indicate significant difference among means.

Figure 6. Stoichiometric characteristics of C, N, P, and K in leaf litter and soil for treatments during the decomposition process at four sampling times (means ± SE), p < 0.05, p < 0.01, p < 0.001.

Figure 6. Stoichiometric characteristics of C, N, P, and K in leaf litter and soil for treatments during the decomposition process at four sampling times (means ± SE), p < 0.05, p < 0.01, p < 0.001.

Figure 7. Correlations between C, N, P and K concentration in leaf litter and soil at four sampling stages (means ± SE), p < 0.05, p < 0.01, p < 0.001.

Figure 7. Correlations between C, N, P and K concentration in leaf litter and soil at four sampling stages (means ± SE), p < 0.05, p < 0.01, p < 0.001.

Figure 8. Correlations between C, N, P and K concentration and between their stoichiometric characters at four sampling stages (means ± SE), p < 0.05, p < 0.01, p < 0.001.

Figure 8. Correlations between C, N, P and K concentration and between their stoichiometric characters at four sampling stages (means ± SE), p < 0.05, p < 0.01, p < 0.001.

Data Availability

Data will be available on request.