916
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

CD3-CD8 immune score associated with a clinical score stratifies PDAC prognosis regardless of adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy

, , , , , , , , , , , & show all
Article: 2294563 | Received 21 Jun 2023, Accepted 08 Dec 2023, Published online: 21 Dec 2023

Figures & data

Table 1. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the two cohorts.

Figure 1. Description of PDAC immune populations and their associated prognostic value.

Representative images of PDAC infiltrates (left panel) and their detection using QuPath (right panel). Scale bar is 200 µm (a). Kaplan-Meier survival curves for overall survival (OS) according to CD3-IM (b), CD3-TC (c), CD8-IM (d) and CD8-TC (e). Log-rank test; HR = hazard ratio, 95% CI in square brackets.
Figure 1. Description of PDAC immune populations and their associated prognostic value.

Figure 2. Immune score combining CD3 and CD8 IHC markers is associated with PDAC prognosis.

(a) Graphical abstract showing immune score generation. Kaplan-Meier curves for the immune score (IS) in 5 modalities (score 0 to 4) in terms of OS (b) and PFS (c) in the training dataset. Kaplan-Meier curves for low (0–2) vs high (3–4) immune score in terms of OS (d) and PFS (e) in the training dataset. Log-rank test; HR = hazard ratio, 95% CI in square brackets.
Figure 2. Immune score combining CD3 and CD8 IHC markers is associated with PDAC prognosis.

Table 2. Univariate and multivatiate Cox models for overall survival in the whole cohort (complete data for n = 280 patients).

Table 3. Univariate and multivatiate Cox models for progression-free survival in the whole cohort (complete data for n = 273 patients).

Figure 3. Improved prognostic value for PDAC outcome with a combination of clinical features and immune score.

Kaplan-Meier curves for low vs high clinical score in the training (a) and validation datasets (b) in terms of OS. Kaplan-Meier curves for low vs high combined (clinical + immune) score in the training (c) and validation datasets (d) in terms of OS. AUC for predictive value of the different models (e). Log-rank test; HR = hazard ratio, 95% CI in square brackets.
Figure 3. Improved prognostic value for PDAC outcome with a combination of clinical features and immune score.

Figure 4. Combined score associating immune score and clinical score is associated with PDAC prognosis regardless of neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy.

Kaplan-Meier curves for low vs high immune score (IS) in patients with adjuvant chemotherapy (a) and in patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (b) in the training dataset in terms of OS. Kaplan-Meier curves for low vs high combined score in patients with adjuvant chemotherapy (c) and in patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (d) in the training dataset in terms of OS.
Figure 4. Combined score associating immune score and clinical score is associated with PDAC prognosis regardless of neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy.
Supplemental material

Supplemental_Figures_Schoumacher_revised.docx

Download MS Word (410.1 KB)

Supplementary_Methods1_SM1_CGE_investigators_list.docx

Download MS Word (11.8 KB)

Supplementary_Methods2_SM2_Schoumacher.docx

Download MS Word (205.3 KB)

Data availability statement

Date are available on reasonable request.