Figures & data
Table 1. Sequences of long oligos for synthesizing full coding sequence of CGA-N12
Figure 1. Design of coding sequence of chromogranin A-derived peptide CGA-N12 with four copies. Yellow highlight color showed processing sites of Kex2 and Ste13 proteases. Red letters showed the difference of codon between native sequence and optimized sequence
![Figure 1. Design of coding sequence of chromogranin A-derived peptide CGA-N12 with four copies. Yellow highlight color showed processing sites of Kex2 and Ste13 proteases. Red letters showed the difference of codon between native sequence and optimized sequence](/cms/asset/c68e4779-91a6-4cfa-b875-a44357b00ae9/kbie_a_1736237_f0001_oc.jpg)
Figure 2. Synthesis of synN12 and construction of expression vector pPIC9-N12. a) Schematic diagram of synthesizing full coding sequence of CGA-N12. b) Construct of expression vector pPIC9-N12. c) Identification of expression vector pPIC9-N12 digesting by restriction enzymes
![Figure 2. Synthesis of synN12 and construction of expression vector pPIC9-N12. a) Schematic diagram of synthesizing full coding sequence of CGA-N12. b) Construct of expression vector pPIC9-N12. c) Identification of expression vector pPIC9-N12 digesting by restriction enzymes](/cms/asset/35b5d081-81f3-4e4c-b2e0-9139cd63f654/kbie_a_1736237_f0002_oc.jpg)
Figure 3. The toxicity of CGA-N12 toward Pichia pastoris and analysis of transformants by genomic PCR. a) The inhibition zone test to check the toxicity of CGA-N12 toward Pichia pastoris. b) PCR analysis of transformants. Plasmid pPIC9-N12 (lane 5) or GS115 genomic DNA (lane 6) as template were employed as controls. #1, #2, and #3 represented three different transformants using in this study
![Figure 3. The toxicity of CGA-N12 toward Pichia pastoris and analysis of transformants by genomic PCR. a) The inhibition zone test to check the toxicity of CGA-N12 toward Pichia pastoris. b) PCR analysis of transformants. Plasmid pPIC9-N12 (lane 5) or GS115 genomic DNA (lane 6) as template were employed as controls. #1, #2, and #3 represented three different transformants using in this study](/cms/asset/41e2d8d3-f546-42d6-93a0-f7436709c842/kbie_a_1736237_f0003_oc.jpg)
Figure 4. Expression of recombinant CGA-N12 in Pichia pastoris. a) HPLC analysis of fermentation supernatant culturing in BMMY medium. b) HPLC analysis of fermentation supernatant culturing in BMM medium. c) HPLC analysis of synthetic CGA-N12 peptide used as the internal standard. Synthetic CGA-N12 peptide was added into BMM medium to reach the concentration of 1 mg/mL, and 60 μL of the sample was loaded into HPLC column for separation
![Figure 4. Expression of recombinant CGA-N12 in Pichia pastoris. a) HPLC analysis of fermentation supernatant culturing in BMMY medium. b) HPLC analysis of fermentation supernatant culturing in BMM medium. c) HPLC analysis of synthetic CGA-N12 peptide used as the internal standard. Synthetic CGA-N12 peptide was added into BMM medium to reach the concentration of 1 mg/mL, and 60 μL of the sample was loaded into HPLC column for separation](/cms/asset/241b2337-2b0d-4cef-8686-9ef0c368e6e7/kbie_a_1736237_f0004_b.gif)