Figures & data
Figure 1. Structuring WGCNA. (a) Sample tree clustering and clinical traits (Survival days; vital: white = alive, red = dead, gray = missing value; KPS) heat map of 38 GBM tissues in older adults. (b) Scale independence of various soft-threshold values. (c) Mean connectivity of various soft-threshold values
![Figure 1. Structuring WGCNA. (a) Sample tree clustering and clinical traits (Survival days; vital: white = alive, red = dead, gray = missing value; KPS) heat map of 38 GBM tissues in older adults. (b) Scale independence of various soft-threshold values. (c) Mean connectivity of various soft-threshold values](/cms/asset/0760b61f-9a42-4096-9b0a-71c9b2ae21b5/kbie_a_1975980_f0001_oc.jpg)
Table 1. Detail of hub genes in each significant module
Figure 2. Module clusters and relationships with clinical traits. (a) Clustering dendrograms of all genes with dissimilarity based on topological overlap, together with assigned module colors. (b) Identification of significant modules associated with clinical traits (survival days, vital, and KPS). Each cell in the heat map contains the corresponding correlation score and P-value. Red indicates a positive correlation, whereas green indicates a negative correlation
![Figure 2. Module clusters and relationships with clinical traits. (a) Clustering dendrograms of all genes with dissimilarity based on topological overlap, together with assigned module colors. (b) Identification of significant modules associated with clinical traits (survival days, vital, and KPS). Each cell in the heat map contains the corresponding correlation score and P-value. Red indicates a positive correlation, whereas green indicates a negative correlation](/cms/asset/57f7133e-a3a7-4fd6-9e1a-20c21979f1fa/kbie_a_1975980_f0002_oc.jpg)
Figure 3. Relationship between gene significance (GS) and module membership (MM) in significant modules
![Figure 3. Relationship between gene significance (GS) and module membership (MM) in significant modules](/cms/asset/fa6ef3bc-7b79-4871-a6cb-ab558660e121/kbie_a_1975980_f0003_oc.jpg)
Figure 5. Selecting hub genes in GBM. (a) Module core genes used to construct protein-protein interaction network. Nodes indicate genes, lines indicate interactions. (b) Genes with top 10 degree score are shown
![Figure 5. Selecting hub genes in GBM. (a) Module core genes used to construct protein-protein interaction network. Nodes indicate genes, lines indicate interactions. (b) Genes with top 10 degree score are shown](/cms/asset/c0f8358c-4e5f-4484-8632-89fe810ddb5e/kbie_a_1975980_f0005_oc.jpg)
Table 2. Detail IHC score of ERMN, MOBP, PLP1 and OPALIN in GBM tissues provided by the elder patients with low KPS score and high KPS score
Figure 8. ERMN, MOBP, PLP1 and OPALIN were highly expressed in the GBM tissues provided by the older patients with lower KPS scores. (a) IHC stain determined the expression of ERMN, MOBP, PLP1 and OPALIN in GBM tissues provided by the older patients with low and high KPS scores. (b) ROC analysis was performed to determine the diagnostic value of ERMN, MOBP, PLP1 and OPALIN to distinguish the GBM tissues provided by the older patients with low and high KPS scores
![Figure 8. ERMN, MOBP, PLP1 and OPALIN were highly expressed in the GBM tissues provided by the older patients with lower KPS scores. (a) IHC stain determined the expression of ERMN, MOBP, PLP1 and OPALIN in GBM tissues provided by the older patients with low and high KPS scores. (b) ROC analysis was performed to determine the diagnostic value of ERMN, MOBP, PLP1 and OPALIN to distinguish the GBM tissues provided by the older patients with low and high KPS scores](/cms/asset/3d8e73e7-891c-49c2-832e-663fce73c58b/kbie_a_1975980_f0008_oc.jpg)