1,876
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Reports

Strain-Induced Reverse Phase Transformation in Nanocrystalline Co-Ni Alloys

, , &
Pages 107-113 | Received 09 Jul 2014, Accepted 14 Nov 2014, Published online: 11 Dec 2014

Figures & data

Figure 1. Phase diagram of Co-Ni.[Citation12]

Figure 1. Phase diagram of Co-Ni.[Citation12]

Table 1. Composition of electroplating baths used in the present study.

Table 2. Pulse plating conditions leading to acceptable nanocrystalline Co-Ni deposits from saccharin-containing electrolyte.

Figure 2. Initial structure (1.bright-field, 2.dark-field, 3.SAED, 4.XRD) of as-deposited samples with different nickel contents: (a) Co-20.6at%Ni; (b) Co-31.0at%Ni and (c) Co-48.0at%Ni.

Figure 2. Initial structure (1.bright-field, 2.dark-field, 3.SAED, 4.XRD) of as-deposited samples with different nickel contents: (a) Co-20.6at%Ni; (b) Co-31.0at%Ni and (c) Co-48.0at%Ni.

Figure 3. Typical tensile engineering stress–strain curves under a tensile rate of 0.5 mm/min: (a) free-standing sample; (b) sample together with substrate; (c) 304 stainless steel substrate and (d) curve of deposit layer estimated by ROM. The inset shows the geometry of tensile samples (R, radius of curvature).

Figure 3. Typical tensile engineering stress–strain curves under a tensile rate of 0.5 mm/min: (a) free-standing sample; (b) sample together with substrate; (c) 304 stainless steel substrate and (d) curve of deposit layer estimated by ROM. The inset shows the geometry of tensile samples (R, radius of curvature).

Figure 4. Bight-field TEM images of Co-31.0at%Ni after different tensile tests: (a)  = 0.35% (free-standing sample); (b)  = 0.6%; (c)  = 1.0%; (d)  = 1.4% and (e)  = 1.5%.

Figure 4. Bight-field TEM images of Co-31.0at%Ni after different tensile tests: (a)  = 0.35% (free-standing sample); (b)  = 0.6%; (c)  = 1.0%; (d)  = 1.4% and (e)  = 1.5%.

Figure 5. Structure of Co-31.0at%Ni samples after tensile failure up to  = 1.5%: (a) overall bright-field image; (b) bright-field image of the grown grains; (c) SAED pattern corresponding to the background; (d) SAED pattern corresponding to the grains grown up, which is measured by nano-beam diffraction (NBD) model and (e) X-ray diffraction pattern.

Figure 5. Structure of Co-31.0at%Ni samples after tensile failure up to  = 1.5%: (a) overall bright-field image; (b) bright-field image of the grown grains; (c) SAED pattern corresponding to the background; (d) SAED pattern corresponding to the grains grown up, which is measured by nano-beam diffraction (NBD) model and (e) X-ray diffraction pattern.