2,296
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Report

Large bias-induced piezoelectric response in the ferroelectric polymer P(VDF-TrFE) for MEMS resonators

ORCID Icon, , , &
Pages 195-203 | Received 28 Aug 2020, Published online: 17 Jan 2021

Figures & data

Figure 1. Thin film characteristics of P(VDF-TrFE). (a) AFM images showing the height profile of the ferroelectric polymer P(VDF-TrFE) for a non-annealed and annealed sample at 140°C, respectively. (b) Specular XRD measurements of P(VDF-TrFE) confirming the presence of the polar β-phase conformation that renders its ferroelectric properties. The crystallinity raises significantly after the annealing at 140°C. (c) Bistable hysteresis loops of the polarisation as a function of the applied field, revealing the ferroelectric characteristic of the P(VDF-TrFE) thin films synthesised within this work. Additionally, the non-linear longitudinal electrostrain behaviour of the polymer is shown. All measurements have been performed in air at room temperature. The polymer film had a thickness of 500 nm.

Figure 1. Thin film characteristics of P(VDF-TrFE). (a) AFM images showing the height profile of the ferroelectric polymer P(VDF-TrFE) for a non-annealed and annealed sample at 140°C, respectively. (b) Specular XRD measurements of P(VDF-TrFE) confirming the presence of the polar β-phase conformation that renders its ferroelectric properties. The crystallinity raises significantly after the annealing at 140°C. (c) Bistable hysteresis loops of the polarisation as a function of the applied field, revealing the ferroelectric characteristic of the P(VDF-TrFE) thin films synthesised within this work. Additionally, the non-linear longitudinal electrostrain behaviour of the polymer is shown. All measurements have been performed in air at room temperature. The polymer film had a thickness of 500 nm.

Figure 2. Ferroelectric polymer microcantilever. (a) SEM image showing a ferroelectric polymer microcantilever investigated in this work. (b) Schematic illustration of the multimorph structure of the microcantilever. The cantilever has a length of 400 µm, a width of 200 µm and a total thickness of around 3 µm. Details about the fabrication steps are presented in the supplementary material. (c) SEM image showing the multimorph structure of the microcantilever, proving that the polymer film has a thickness of 500 nm. (d) Bistable polarisation-field hysteresis loops of the P(VDF-TrFE) thin film incorporated on the silicon microcantilever confirming the ferroelectric state of the polymer. (e) Frequency spectrum of the ferroelectric polymer microcantilever when applying an excitation field of 1 V/µm. A large variety of flexural modes is excited in the cantilever as shown in the inset.

Figure 2. Ferroelectric polymer microcantilever. (a) SEM image showing a ferroelectric polymer microcantilever investigated in this work. (b) Schematic illustration of the multimorph structure of the microcantilever. The cantilever has a length of 400 µm, a width of 200 µm and a total thickness of around 3 µm. Details about the fabrication steps are presented in the supplementary material. (c) SEM image showing the multimorph structure of the microcantilever, proving that the polymer film has a thickness of 500 nm. (d) Bistable polarisation-field hysteresis loops of the P(VDF-TrFE) thin film incorporated on the silicon microcantilever confirming the ferroelectric state of the polymer. (e) Frequency spectrum of the ferroelectric polymer microcantilever when applying an excitation field of 1 V/µm. A large variety of flexural modes is excited in the cantilever as shown in the inset.

Table 1. Comparison of key parameters, such as resonance frequency f0 or Q-factor, of piezoelectric actuated microcantilevers using P(VDF-TrFE) or AlN. The Q-factors of P(VDF-TrFE) cantilevers are significantly lower compared to AlN cantilevers. The resonance frequency f0 and Q-factor were all measured in air.

Figure 3. Electrostrictive and piezoelectric response of the first flexural mode. (a) Amplitude of the first and second harmonic signal as a function of increasing excitation field amplitude EAC measured around the mechanical resonance frequency f0 = 13 kHz and f0/2. (b) Amplitude of the first and second harmonic signal measured over the frequency range from 3 kHz to 15 kHz, which includes f0 and f0/2. The electrostrictive and piezoelectric response are clearly separated. (c), (d) Maximum amplitude of the first and second harmonic resonance peak as a function of the excitation field amplitude EAC. The piezoelectric effect is linear, while the electrostrictive effect shows a quadratic behaviour.

Figure 3. Electrostrictive and piezoelectric response of the first flexural mode. (a) Amplitude of the first and second harmonic signal as a function of increasing excitation field amplitude EAC measured around the mechanical resonance frequency f0 = 13 kHz and f0/2. (b) Amplitude of the first and second harmonic signal measured over the frequency range from 3 kHz to 15 kHz, which includes f0 and f0/2. The electrostrictive and piezoelectric response are clearly separated. (c), (d) Maximum amplitude of the first and second harmonic resonance peak as a function of the excitation field amplitude EAC. The piezoelectric effect is linear, while the electrostrictive effect shows a quadratic behaviour.

Figure 4. Electrostrictive and piezoelectric response of the first flexural mode as a function of bias field applied to the ferroelectric polymer. An AC field of 2.5 V/µm was used to excite the microcantilever. (a) Amplitude of the first and second harmonic signal as a function of increasing bias field EDC measured around the mechanical resonance frequency f0 = 13 kHz and f0/2. (b) Amplitude of the first and second harmonic signal measured over the frequency range from 3 kHz to 15 kHz, which includes f0 and f0/2, showing the significant contrast between the electrostrictive and piezoelectric response as a function of the applied bias field EDC. (c),(d) Maximum amplitude of the first and second harmonic resonance peak as a function of the bias field EDC. The piezoelectric response increases linearly with increasing EDC. In contrast, an increased EDC shows no impact on the electrostrictive response.

Figure 4. Electrostrictive and piezoelectric response of the first flexural mode as a function of bias field applied to the ferroelectric polymer. An AC field of 2.5 V/µm was used to excite the microcantilever. (a) Amplitude of the first and second harmonic signal as a function of increasing bias field EDC measured around the mechanical resonance frequency f0 = 13 kHz and f0/2. (b) Amplitude of the first and second harmonic signal measured over the frequency range from 3 kHz to 15 kHz, which includes f0 and f0/2, showing the significant contrast between the electrostrictive and piezoelectric response as a function of the applied bias field EDC. (c),(d) Maximum amplitude of the first and second harmonic resonance peak as a function of the bias field EDC. The piezoelectric response increases linearly with increasing EDC. In contrast, an increased EDC shows no impact on the electrostrictive response.
Supplemental material

Supplemental Material

Download PDF (371.3 KB)