1,402
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Reports

Tensile deformation dominated by matrix dislocations at intermediate temperatures revealed using in-situ EBSD in superalloys

, ORCID Icon, , , , & show all
Pages 116-124 | Received 13 Nov 2023, Published online: 16 Jan 2024

Figures & data

Figure 1. At intermediate temperatures, Ni-based single crystal superalloys do have similar microstructures under different deformation conditions: (a) The tensile curve of the experimental alloy at 750 °C and the orientation before and after fracture; (b) The microstructure of the experimental alloy after tensile at 750 °C; (c) The tensile creep curve of the experimental alloy at 750 °C/750 MPa and the orientation before and after creep fracture; (d) The microstructure of the experimental alloy after tensile creep at 750 °C/750 MPa.

Figure 1. At intermediate temperatures, Ni-based single crystal superalloys do have similar microstructures under different deformation conditions: (a) The tensile curve of the experimental alloy at 750 °C and the orientation before and after fracture; (b) The microstructure of the experimental alloy after tensile at 750 °C; (c) The tensile creep curve of the experimental alloy at 750 °C/750 MPa and the orientation before and after creep fracture; (d) The microstructure of the experimental alloy after tensile creep at 750 °C/750 MPa.

Figure 2. (a) Schematic diagram of the tensile specimen for in-situ EBSD analysis; (b) The macroscopic feature and the relationship between tensile direction and EBSD coordinates; (c) The stress-strain curve of the specimen for in-situ EBSD analysis.

Figure 2. (a) Schematic diagram of the tensile specimen for in-situ EBSD analysis; (b) The macroscopic feature and the relationship between tensile direction and EBSD coordinates; (c) The stress-strain curve of the specimen for in-situ EBSD analysis.

Figure 3. Surface morphology evolution of the specimen at different deformation stages in Figure (c), and (a)-(h) represent stages A-H, respectively.

Figure 3. Surface morphology evolution of the specimen at different deformation stages in Figure 2(c), and (a)-(h) represent stages A-H, respectively.

Figure 4. Orientation evolution of the specimen at different deformation stages and corresponding Schmid factors for twelve {111} 〈110〉 slip systems.

Figure 4. Orientation evolution of the specimen at different deformation stages and corresponding Schmid factors for twelve {111} 〈110〉 slip systems.

Table 1. Orientation of the specimen at different deformation stages.

Figure 5. (a) The standard [010] stereographic projection; (b) The orientation rotation path of several alloys during tensile deformation at intermediate temperatures; (c) The orientation rotation path of several alloys during tensile creep at intermediate temperatures and high stress; (d) Illustration of orientation rotation in a standard stereographic triangle under {111} 〈110〉 slip; (e) Illustration of orientation rotation in a standard stereographic triangle under {111} 〈112〉 slip.

Figure 5. (a) The standard [010] stereographic projection; (b) The orientation rotation path of several alloys during tensile deformation at intermediate temperatures; (c) The orientation rotation path of several alloys during tensile creep at intermediate temperatures and high stress; (d) Illustration of orientation rotation in a standard stereographic triangle under {111} 〈110〉 slip; (e) Illustration of orientation rotation in a standard stereographic triangle under {111} 〈112〉 slip.
Supplemental material

Supplemental Material

Download MS Word (187.6 KB)