Figures & data
Figure 2. Schematic representation of a mixed PSMA/lipid nanostructure (Paint 3D:6.2003.4017, Microsoft Corporation, 2016).
![Figure 2. Schematic representation of a mixed PSMA/lipid nanostructure (Paint 3D:6.2003.4017, Microsoft Corporation, 2016).](/cms/asset/5d53f9ac-7f55-41d1-8631-96fb172fc945/ianb_a_2198570_f0002_c.jpg)
Figure 3. Schematic diagram for the preparation of propolis-loaded PSMA/PC nanoparticles (Paint 3D:6.2003.4017, Microsoft Corporation, 2016).
![Figure 3. Schematic diagram for the preparation of propolis-loaded PSMA/PC nanoparticles (Paint 3D:6.2003.4017, Microsoft Corporation, 2016).](/cms/asset/7bf8e12b-c743-41ad-bbc9-29b138939b9b/ianb_a_2198570_f0003_c.jpg)
Figure 7. The changes of the averaged UV-absorbance (600 nm) as a function of time for different PSMA/DMPC (90:10) formulations. Results for the aqueous solutions of DMPC and PSMA (1000 P or 2000 P type) are also plotted for comparison.
![Figure 7. The changes of the averaged UV-absorbance (600 nm) as a function of time for different PSMA/DMPC (90:10) formulations. Results for the aqueous solutions of DMPC and PSMA (1000 P or 2000 P type) are also plotted for comparison.](/cms/asset/ae2f696f-2d2e-4192-b66f-0e4d8d6d36fb/ianb_a_2198570_f0007_b.jpg)
Figure 8. Particle size distribution plots (top) and correlation plots (bottom) of hydrated DMPC (solid blue), 1000 P/DMPC (solid black), and 2000 P/DMPC (solid red) particles. The changes in the DLS profiles after a short-term storage (15 min) were also demonstrated for each sample (dashed lines).
![Figure 8. Particle size distribution plots (top) and correlation plots (bottom) of hydrated DMPC (solid blue), 1000 P/DMPC (solid black), and 2000 P/DMPC (solid red) particles. The changes in the DLS profiles after a short-term storage (15 min) were also demonstrated for each sample (dashed lines).](/cms/asset/2b5f9716-8947-4deb-816e-fcfb6de4afcb/ianb_a_2198570_f0008_c.jpg)
Figure 9. SEM images of DMPC vesicles (a–b) and the PSMA/DMPC particles. Image of (a), (b–d), (e) and (f) were taken at the magnifications of ×500, ×50,000, ×10,000 and ×30,000, respectively.
![Figure 9. SEM images of DMPC vesicles (a–b) and the PSMA/DMPC particles. Image of (a), (b–d), (e) and (f) were taken at the magnifications of ×500, ×50,000, ×10,000 and ×30,000, respectively.](/cms/asset/af789171-c52e-4e1c-811b-d536f59a9cfe/ianb_a_2198570_f0009_b.jpg)
Figure 10. Size distribution plots (top) and correlation plots (bottom) of the loaded-particles of 1000 P/DMPC (solid blue) and 2000 P/DMPC (solid red) in comparison to their corresponding unloaded particles. The changes in the distribution profiles for the loaded-1000P/DMPC (dashed blue) and loaded-2000P/DMPC (dashed red) after a short-term storage (15 min) were also demonstrated (dashed lines).
![Figure 10. Size distribution plots (top) and correlation plots (bottom) of the loaded-particles of 1000 P/DMPC (solid blue) and 2000 P/DMPC (solid red) in comparison to their corresponding unloaded particles. The changes in the distribution profiles for the loaded-1000P/DMPC (dashed blue) and loaded-2000P/DMPC (dashed red) after a short-term storage (15 min) were also demonstrated (dashed lines).](/cms/asset/0e673615-8003-4dfb-b561-97222b572790/ianb_a_2198570_f0010_c.jpg)
Table 1. Encapsulation efficiency (EE%) of different PSMA/DMPC systems.
Data availability statement
The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article.