Figures & data
Figure 1. The semantic blocking effect in reaction times. Data from the first cycle were excluded (following Belke et al., Citation2005).
![Figure 1. The semantic blocking effect in reaction times. Data from the first cycle were excluded (following Belke et al., Citation2005).](/cms/asset/68d3074f-1c4d-478e-94d4-f1402fe9e4a7/plcp_a_1395467_f0001_b.gif)
Figure 2. The grand average ERPs of the semantically homogeneous (S+) and heterogeneous (S-) conditions. The top graph (a) depicts the ERPs from a representative anterior electrode FC4, with more negativities in the S- than S+ condition. The middle graph (b) depicts the ERPs from a representative posterior electrode Pz, with more positivities in the S- than the S+ condition. The bar graph (c) summarises the p-values resulting from the pairwise t-tests on the mean amplitudes within each time window per ROI in the semantic blocks. The red line refers to the significance level .05. Four ROIs are represented: left-anterior (blue), right-anterior (green), left-posterior (yellow) and right-posterior (orange).
![Figure 2. The grand average ERPs of the semantically homogeneous (S+) and heterogeneous (S-) conditions. The top graph (a) depicts the ERPs from a representative anterior electrode FC4, with more negativities in the S- than S+ condition. The middle graph (b) depicts the ERPs from a representative posterior electrode Pz, with more positivities in the S- than the S+ condition. The bar graph (c) summarises the p-values resulting from the pairwise t-tests on the mean amplitudes within each time window per ROI in the semantic blocks. The red line refers to the significance level .05. Four ROIs are represented: left-anterior (blue), right-anterior (green), left-posterior (yellow) and right-posterior (orange).](/cms/asset/b44fe525-efdf-4559-9f3c-7db6557418ff/plcp_a_1395467_f0002_c.jpg)
Figure 4. The grand average ERPs of the phonologically homogeneous (P+) and heterogeneous (P-) conditions. The top graph (a) depicts the ERPs from a representative anterior electrode FC4, with more negativities in the P- than P+ condition. The middle graph (b) depicts the ERPs from a representative posterior electrode Pz, with more positivities in the P- than the P+ condition. The bar graph (c) summarises the p-values resulting from the pairwise t-tests on the mean amplitudes within each time window per ROI in the phonological blocks. The red line refers to the significance level .05. Four ROIs are represented: left- anterior (blue), right-anterior (green), left-posterior (yellow) and right-posterior (orange).
![Figure 4. The grand average ERPs of the phonologically homogeneous (P+) and heterogeneous (P-) conditions. The top graph (a) depicts the ERPs from a representative anterior electrode FC4, with more negativities in the P- than P+ condition. The middle graph (b) depicts the ERPs from a representative posterior electrode Pz, with more positivities in the P- than the P+ condition. The bar graph (c) summarises the p-values resulting from the pairwise t-tests on the mean amplitudes within each time window per ROI in the phonological blocks. The red line refers to the significance level .05. Four ROIs are represented: left- anterior (blue), right-anterior (green), left-posterior (yellow) and right-posterior (orange).](/cms/asset/bf445808-e87f-484a-9664-dbc281b33d45/plcp_a_1395467_f0004_c.jpg)