Neural correlates of spoken word production in semantic and phonological blocked cyclic naming

References

• Abdel Rahman, R., & Melinger, A. (2009). Semantic context effects in language production: A swinging lexical network proposal and a review. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24(5), 713–734. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960802597250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aristei, S., Melinger, A., & Abdel Rahman, R. (2011). Electrophysiological chronometry of semantic context effects in language production. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(7), 1567–1586. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2010.21474
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, E., Andonova, E., D’Amico, S., Jacobsen, T., Kohnert, K., Lu, C.-C., … Pleh, C. (2000). Introducing the CRL International Picture-Naming Project (CRL-IPNP). Center for Research in Language Newsletter, 12(1), 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Belke, E. (2008). Effects of working memory load on lexical-semantic encoding in language production. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(2), 357–363. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.2.357
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belke, E. (2017). The role of task-specific response strategies in blocked-cyclic naming. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01955
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belke, E., Meyer, A. S., & Damian, M. F. (2005). Refractory effects in picture naming as assessed in a semantic blocking paradigm. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 58(4), 667–692. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724980443000142
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Belke, E., Shao, Z., & Meyer, A. S. (2017). Strategic origins of early semantic facilitation in the blocked-cyclic naming paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43(10), 1659–1668. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000399
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belke, E., & Stielow, A. (2013). Cumulative and non-cumulative semantic interference in object naming: Evidence from blocked and continuous manipulations of semantic context. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(11), 2135–2160. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2013.775318
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breining, B., Nozari, N., & Rapp, B. (2016). Does segmental overlap help or hurt? Evidence from blocked cyclic naming in spoken and written production. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(2), 500–506. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0900-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, A., Strijkers, K., Martin, C., & Thierry, G. (2009). The time course of word retrieval revealed by event-related brain potentials during overt speech. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(50), 21442–21446. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0908921106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damian, M. F. (2003). Articulatory duration in single-word speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29(3), 416–431. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.29.3.416
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damian, M. F., & Als, L. C. (2005). Long-lasting semantic context effects in the spoken production of object names. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(6), 1372–1384. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.31.6.1372
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damian, M. F., & Dumay, N. (2009). Exploring phonological encoding through repeated segments. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24(5), 685–712. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960802351260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damian, M. F., Vigliocco, G., & Levelt, W. J. (2001). Effects of semantic context in the naming of pictures and words. Cognition, 81(3), B77–B86. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(01)00135-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dell’Acqua, R., Sessa, P., Peressotti, F., Mulatti, C., Navarrete, E., & Grainger, J. (2010). ERP evidence for ultra-fast semantic processing in the picture–word interference paradigm. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00177
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delorme, A., & Makeig, S. (2004). EEGLAB: An open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 134(1), 9–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donchin, E. (1981). Surprise!…Surprise? Psychophysiology, 18(5), 493–513. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1981.tb01815.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, W. R., & Düngelhoff, F.-J. (1984). The time course of picture-word interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10(5), 640–654. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.10.5.640
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holm, S. (1979). A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6(2), 65–70. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/4615733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, D., Nickels, L., Coltheart, M., & Cole-Virtue, J. (2006). Cumulative semantic inhibition in picture naming: Experimental and computational studies. Cognition, 100(3), 464–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2005.02.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Indefrey, P. (2011). The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components: A critical update. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00255
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Indefrey, P., & Levelt, W. J. M. (2004). The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components. Cognition, 92(1), 101–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2002.06.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen, N., Hernández-Cabrera, J. A., Van der Meij, M., & Barber, H. A. (2015). Tracking the time course of competition during word production: Evidence for a post-retrieval mechanism of conflict resolution. Cerebral Cortex, 25(9), 2960–2969. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhu092
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jescheniak, J. D., Hahne, A., & Schriefers, H. (2003). Information flow in the mental lexicon during speech planning: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Cognitive Brain Research, 15(3), 261–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-6410(02)00198-2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2011). Thirty years and counting: Finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 621–647. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.131123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, E. F., Philips, C., & Poeppel, D. (2008). A cortical network for semantics: (de)constructing the N400. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9(12), 920–933. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2532
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., Hao, M., Li, P., & Shu, H. (2011). Timed picture naming norms for Mandarin Chinese. PLoS ONE, 6(1), e16505. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016505
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luck, S. (2005). An introduction to the event-related potential technique. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, A. S. (1991). The time course of phonological encoding in language production: Phonological encoding inside a syllable. Journal of Memory and Language, 30(1), 69–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(91)90011-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misra, M., & Holcomb, P. J. (2003). Event–related potential indices of masked repetition priming. Psychophysiology, 40(1), 115–130. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8986.00012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navarrete, E., Del Prato, P., Peressotti, F., & Mahon, B. Z. (2014). Lexical selection is not by competition: Evidence from the blocked naming paradigm. Journal of Memory and Language, 76, 253–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2014.05.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navarrete, E., Mahon, B. Z., & Caramazza, A. (2010). The cumulative semantic cost does not reflect lexical selection by competition. Acta Psychologica, 134(3), 279–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.02.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oostenveld, R., Fries, R., Maris, E., & Schoffelen, J.-M. (2011). Fieldtrip: Open source software for advanced analysis of MEG, EEG, and invasive electrophysiological data. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2011, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/156869
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oppenheim, G. M., Dell, G. S., & Schwartz, M. F. (2010). The dark side of incremental learning: A model of cumulative semantic interference during lexical access in speech production. Cognition, 114(2), 227–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.09.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porcaro, C., Medaglia, M. T., & Krott, A. (2015). Removing speech artifacts from electroencephalographic recordings during overt picture naming. NeuroImage, 105, 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.10.049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Praamstra, P., Meyer, A. S., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1994). Neurophysiological manifestations of phonological processing: Latency variation of a negative ERP component timelocked to phonological mismatch. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 6(3), 204–219. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.1994.6.3.204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Protopapas, A. (2007). Check vocal: A program to facilitate checking the accuracy and response time of vocal responses from DMDX. Behavior Research Methods, 39(4), 859–862. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192979
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roelofs, A. (1999). Phonological segments and features as planning units in speech production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14(2), 173–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/016909699386338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rugg, M. D. (1985). The effects of semantic priming and word repetition on event-related potentials. Psychophysiology, 22(6), 642–647. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1985.tb01661.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rugg, M. D. (1990). Event-related brain potentials dissociate repetition effects of high-and low-frequency words. Memory & Cognition, 18(4), 367–379. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197126
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnur, T. T., Schwartz, M. F., Brecher, A., & Hodgson, C. (2006). Semantic interference during blocked-cyclic naming: Evidence from aphasia. Journal of Memory and Language, 54(2), 199–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2005.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnur, T. T., Schwartz, M. F., Kimberg, D. Y., Hirshorn, E., Coslett, H. B., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2009). Localizing interference during naming: Convergent neuroimaging and neuropsychological evidence for the function of Broca’s area. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(1), 322–327. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0805874106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schriefers, H., Meyer, A. S., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1990). Exploring the time course of lexical access in language production: Picture-word interference studies. Journal of Memory and Language, 29(1), 86–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(90)90011-N
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shao, Z., Roelofs, A., Martin, R. C., & Meyer, A. S. (2015). Selective inhibition and naming performance in semantic blocking, picture-word interference, and color-word Stroop tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41(6), 1806–1820. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039363
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snodgrass, J. G., & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6(2), 174–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.6.2.174
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Spalek, K., Damian, M. F., & Bölte, J. (2013). Is lexical selection in spoken word production competitive? Introduction to the special issue on lexical competition in language production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28(5), 597–614. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2012.718088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Casteren, M., & Davis, M. H. (2006). Mix, a program for pseudorandomization. Behavior Research Methods, 38(4), 584–589. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193889
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Turennout, M., Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. M. (1997). Electrophysiological evidence on the time course of semantic and phonological processes in speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23(4), 787–806. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.23.4.787
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Q., & Yang, Y. (2003). The determiners of pictures – naming latency. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 35, 447–454.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, X., Damian, M. F., & Zhang, Q. (2015). Seriality of semantic and phonological processes during overt speech in Mandarin as revealed by event-related brain potentials. Brain and Language, 144, 16–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2015.03.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar