1,291
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Dynamic relationships among winning in various sports and donations to collegiate athletic departments

, & | (Reviewing Editor)
Article: 1325056 | Received 29 Mar 2017, Accepted 24 Apr 2017, Published online: 05 May 2017

Figures & data

Table 1. Panel regressions – Power 5 Conferences, Pacific-12 Conference is the base conferenceTable Footnote1

Table 2. p-values of differences in contributions between Power 5 Conferences using Pairwise F-tests, Pacific-12 Conference is the base conference

Table 3. Panel regressions – Non-Power 5 Conferences, Western Athletic Conference is the base conferenceTable Footnote1

Table 4. p-values of differences in contributions between Non-power 5 Conferences using Pairwise F-tests, Western Athletic Conference is the base conference

Table 5. Panel regressions – FCS Conferences, Southland Conference is the base conferenceTable Footnote1

Table 6. p-values of differences in contributions between FCS Conferences using Pairwise F-tests, Southland Conference is the base conference

Figure 1. Responses of donations to a one time shock in the endogenous variables (listed beneath the graphs) along with 95% confidence interval.

Figure 1. Responses of donations to a one time shock in the endogenous variables (listed beneath the graphs) along with 95% confidence interval.

Figure 2. Responses of winning percentages (listing in each column row) to a one time shock in the endogenous variables (listed beneath the graphs) for Power 5 Conferences along with 95% confidence interval.

Figure 2. Responses of winning percentages (listing in each column row) to a one time shock in the endogenous variables (listed beneath the graphs) for Power 5 Conferences along with 95% confidence interval.

Figure 3. Responses of winning percentages (listing in each column row) to a one time shock in the endogenous variables (listed beneath the graphs) for Non-power 5 Conferences along with 95% confidence interval.

Figure 3. Responses of winning percentages (listing in each column row) to a one time shock in the endogenous variables (listed beneath the graphs) for Non-power 5 Conferences along with 95% confidence interval.

Figure 4. Responses of winning percentages (listing in each column row) to a one time shock in the endogenous variables (listed beneath the graphs) for FCS Conferences along with 95% confidence interval.

Figure 4. Responses of winning percentages (listing in each column row) to a one time shock in the endogenous variables (listed beneath the graphs) for FCS Conferences along with 95% confidence interval.

Table 7. Forecasts error variance decompositions for the Power 5 Conferences from the PVAR assuming a Cholesky decomposition order of basketball, football, other sports programs, and donations

Table 8. Forecasts error variance decompositions for the Non-power 5 Conferences from the PVAR assuming a Cholesky decomposition order of basketball, football, other sports programs, and donations

Table 9. Forecasts error variance decompositions for the FCS Conferences from the PVAR assuming a Cholesky decomposition order of basketball, football, other sports programs, and donations