733
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Processes, patterns, practices, and perspectives: What we talk about when we talk about “development”

ORCID Icon | (Reviewing Editor)
Article: 1336855 | Received 11 Dec 2016, Accepted 28 May 2017, Published online: 08 Jun 2017

Figures & data

Figure 1. A conceptual schematic describing the construction of a descriptive typology (1) and application of it to explore relationships among types that are based on interest, values, or purpose (2) or hypothesize an empirical relationship (3).

Note: Two alternative formulations are given for each type of relationship (a-c), which are only in competition for the latter ontological category (3).
Figure 1. A conceptual schematic describing the construction of a descriptive typology (1) and application of it to explore relationships among types that are based on interest, values, or purpose (2) or hypothesize an empirical relationship (3).

Figure 2. A schematic of the process that was used to classify textual occurrences of “development” within the final descriptive typology.

Notes: The solid lines and bold categories indicate the route of classification of the uses that are the primary interest in this analysis. For the 2nd and 3rd levels, the classification proceeded left to right, such that “Deliberate” and “Unclear” were everything that wasn’t classified in the alternatives to the left of each.
Figure 2. A schematic of the process that was used to classify textual occurrences of “development” within the final descriptive typology.

Table 1. Summary of the general temporal trends of use of “development” observed in selected articles from World Development, with evidence from multiple lines of textual analysis

Table 2. Summary of the textual analysis of selected journal articles from World Development in 1973, 1993, and 2013, shown here as (A) the number of articles with representation (1+ uses), (B) the total uses across all articles, and the (C) median and (D) maximum use within each article

Table 3. Occurrence of adjacent qualifiers with textual use of “development” in the selected articles of World Development

Table 4. Representation of general categories within World Development in the selected years, measured as the mean number of categories found in each article (out of 4) and the mean of a weighted score for each category

Table 5. Summary of use of “developed” and “developing” to refer to societies within the selected articles from World Development