Knowledge, perceived effectiveness and qualification of traffic rules, police supervision, sanctions and justice

Figures & data

Table 1. Distribution national census and sample, based on age groups

Age	Census	Distribution	Sample
14–17	248.62	1, 21	13
18–24	1.987.05	9, 67	106
25–29	2.635.76	12, 83	141
30–44	7.809.78	38, 01	418
45–65	6.158.15	29, 97	331
Over 65	1.706.37	8, 31	91
Total	20.545.73	100	1.100

Figure 1. Reported level of knowledge of the traffic normative.

Figure 2. Perception of police supervision.

Figure 3. Level of according to affirmation “agents are placed in places to stop vehicles security”.

Figure 4. Level of according to affirmation “agents are located in the most dangerous places”.

Figure 5. Level of agreement to affirmation “the purpose of the penalty is educational”.

Figure 6. Level of agreement to affirmation “the purpose of the penalty is tax collection”.

Figure 7. Criteria to stablish the type of sanction (percentages).

Figure 8. Penalties received (not parking).

Figure 9. Parking penalties received.

Figure 10. Assessment of justice in Spain.

Figure 11. Assessment of the functioning of justice in terms of traffic and road safety.