Attitude of stakeholders towards the organic law for the Bangsamoro autonomous region in Muslim Mindanao (OLBARMM)

Figures & data

Figure 1. Conceptual framework.

Figure 2. Respondents’ profile by age.

Figure 3. Respondents’ profile by province.

Table 2. Path estimates.

Paths	Original Sample	Sample Mean	Std Dev	T Statistics	p-values
Affect – Attitude	0.699	0.698	0.043	16.391	0.000
Behavior – Attitude	0.263	0.263	0.046	5.750	0.000
Cognition - Attitude	0.034	0.034	0.035	0.979	0.327

*p-value significant at <.05.

Table 3. f square values.

Paths	f Square
Affect – Attitude	1.293
Behavior – Attitude	0.183
Cognition - Attitude	0.003

Table 4. Descriptive statistics by respondents 25 years old and below.

	Min	Max	Mean	Std Dev
Affect	14	70	51.78	10.82
Behavior	0	2	1.25	.78
Cognition	2	13	7.38	2.33
Attitude	1	6	4.47	1.27

Table 5. Descriptive statistics by respondents 26 years old and above.

	Min	Max	Mean	Std Dev
Affect	14	70	50.90	11.10
Behavior	0	2	1.52	.78
Cognition	4	15	8.59	2.49
Attitude	1	6	4.53	1.07

Table 13. Henseler’s PLS-MGA results by province.

	Path Coefficients-diff (Lanao del Sur - Maguindanao)	p-values (Lanao del Sur vs. Maguindanao)
Affect – Attitude	−0.029	0.734
Behavior - Attitude	0.106	0.256
Cognition - Attitude	−0.188	0.011

*p-value significant at < .05 or >.95.

Table 1. Breakdown of questions.

Variable	Item
Affect	I think that the political structure proposed by OLBARMM is representative of the Moro community, its diverse interests and backgrounds, and will give voice to all groups.
	I think that the economic provisions proposed by the OLBARMM are equitable to all Moro groups and communities.
	I think that the economic provisions proposed by the OLBARMM lead towards socio-economic development of the Bangsamoro region.
	I think that the normalization provisions proposed by OLBARMM will protect the people.
	I think that the OLBARMM can address the Bangsamoro struggle for their right to self-determination.
	I think that the OLBARMM can alleviate the socio-economic condition of the Bangsamoro people.
	I think that the OLBARMM is designed to bring just and lasting peace in Bangsamoro region.
	I think that the OLBARMM is constitutional.
	I think that the OLBARMM could dismantle the culture of impunity.
	I think that the adoption of Shari’ah in the BARMM is just and lawful.
	I think that the political structure proposed by OLBARMM is fair.
	I think that the economic provisions proposed by the OLBARMM are beneficial to the economic development of the Moros and the Bangsamoro.
	I think that the normalization measures proposed by OLBARMM will be effective in achieving peace and order in the region.
	I think that I will be safe under the normalization measures proposed by OLBARMM.
Behavior	Did you vote in favor of OLBARMM?
Cognition	What is the Bangsamoro Organic Law?
	What is the basis of the territorial jurisdiction of the Bangsamoro?
	What is the political relation of the national government and the Bangsamoro government?
	Who can run as ministers in the Bangsamoro Parliament?
	What is the form of government in the Bangsamoro?
	What is the agency that will serve as the caretaker during the Bangsamoro transition?
	What are the sources of fiscal autonomy in the Bangsamoro?
	Where are the oil-reserves of the Bangsamoro located?
	What is the basis of the Bangsamoro justice system?
	What agency is in charge of the qualification of the Bangsamoro Police?
	How many percent is shared in terms of taxes collected between the National government and the Bangsamoro government?
	Who supervises the Bangsamoro government?
	Who prepares the budget in the Bangsamoro?
	Who is the ceremonial head of the Bangsamoro?
	Who are the citizens of the Bangsamoro?
Attitude	I approve of the political, economic and normalization provisions of OLBARMM.
	I will continue to support OLBARMM either as a leader or citizen

Table 8. Path estimates for 25 years old and below model.

Paths	Original Sample	Sample Mean	Std Dev	TStatistics	p-values
Affect – Attitude	0.70	0.70	0.07	10.044	0.00
Behavior – Attitude	0.35	0.33	0.06	5.26	0.00
Cognition - Attitude	0.080	0.08	0.05	1.48	0.14

*p-value significant at <.05.

Table 9. Path estimates for 26 years old and above model.

Paths	Original Sample	Sample Mean	Std Dev	T Statistics	p-values
Affect – Attitude	0.73	0.72	0.09	8.32	0.00
Behavior – Attitude	0.13	0.14	0.10	1.31	0.19
Cognition - Attitude	0.04	0.04	0.08	0.55	0.14

*p-value significant at <.05.

Table 6. Descriptive Statistics by Respondents from Lanao del Sur.

	Min	Max	Mean	Std Dev
Affect	16	70	50.66	10.52
Behavior	0	2	1.38	.78
Cognition	2	13	7.08	2.36
Attitude	1	6	4.41	1.29

Table 7. Descriptive Statistics by Respondents from Maguindanao.

	Min	Max	Mean	Std Dev
Affect	14	70	51.43	11.12
Behavior	0	2	1.32	.80
Cognition	2	15	8.19	2.42
Attitude	1	6	4.60	1.12

Table 10. Path estimates for Lanao del Sur model.

Paths	Original Sample	Sample Mean	Std Dev	TStatistics	p-values
Affect – Attitude	0.69	0.69	0.06	12.25	0.00
Behavior – Attitude	0.33	0.32	0.07	5.00	0.00
Cognition - Attitude	−0.07	−0.08	0.05	1.42	0.16

*p-value significant at <.05.

Table 11. Path estimates for maguindanao model.

Paths	Original Sample	Sample Mean	Std Dev	T Statistics	p-values
Affect – Attitude	0.721	0.717	0.07	10.94	0.00
Behavior – Attitude	0.221	0.224	0.07	3.30	0.00
Cognition - Attitude	0.115	0.117	0.05	2.23	0.03

*p-value significant at <.05.

Table 12. Henseler’s PLS-MGA results by age.

	Path Coefficients-diff (25 yrs old & below – 26 yrs old & above)	p-value (25 yrs old & below vs. 26 yrs old above)
Affect – Attitude	−0.033	0.769
Behavior - Attitude	0.204	0.090
Cognition - Attitude	0.039	0.673

*p-value significant at < .05 or >.95.