Figures & data
Figure 1. Design of dual texture geometry with micro-holes and grooves with dimensions A = 100 μm; B = 100 μm; C = 150 μm; D = 50 μm; E = 50 μm; and b) Laser texture tool SEM image.
Table 1. Dry machining process parameters levels.
Table 2. Central composite design (20 runs) and experimental results.
Table 3. ANOVA for the Ra – quadratic model.
Figure 2. Ra - Normal plot of residuals.
Table 4. Ra ANOVA – reduced quadratic model.
Figure 3. Response surface plots for Ra (a) vc and f (b) vc and d (c) f and d.
Figure 4. Ra – comparison of measured and predicted.
Table 5. ANOVA for the Tool-Chip interface temperature – quadratic model.
Figure 5. TCt - Normal plot of residuals.
Table 6. ANOVA for the Tool-Chip interface temperature-reduced quadratic model.
Figure 6. Response surface plots for temperature (a) vc and f (b) vc and d (c) f and d.
Figure 7. TCt – comparison of measured and predicted.
Table 7. Results for the validation tests.
Table 8. Range of parameters and their importance with weightage.
Figure 8. Desirability bar graph for the best desirability index.
Table 9. Point prediction.
Data availability statement
The data underlying the results or analyses presented in their article is available upon reasonable request.