2,565
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
SOIL & CROP SCIENCES

Response of potato crop to selected nutrients in central and eastern highlands of Kenya

, , , , ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon | (Reviewing editor) show all
Article: 1898762 | Received 06 Dec 2020, Accepted 01 Mar 2021, Published online: 14 Mar 2021

Figures & data

Table 1. Soil chemical properties of the three study sites

Figure 1. Rainfall and minimum and maximum temperatures in Meru and Nyandarua sites during the study period

Figure 1. Rainfall and minimum and maximum temperatures in Meru and Nyandarua sites during the study period

Table 2. Amount of pure nutrients supplied for each treatment

Table 3. Potato leaf area index (LAI) at flowering and tuber bulking stages

Table 4. Haulm dry weight (DW) and harvest index for potato at tuber bulking stage

Table 5. Haulm N, P and K uptake under omission of selected nutrients

Table 6. Potato yield at 60 and 90 days after emergence (DAE)

Figure 2. Percent potato yield response to omission of N, P, K, S and B compared to no fertilizer application treatment at 60 days after emergence in 2016 long rains (a) and 2016 short rains (b)

Figure 2. Percent potato yield response to omission of N, P, K, S and B compared to no fertilizer application treatment at 60 days after emergence in 2016 long rains (a) and 2016 short rains (b)

Figure 3. Percent potato yield response to omission of N, P, K, S and B compared to no fertilizer application treatment at final harvest in 2016 long rains (a) and 2016 short rains (b)

Figure 3. Percent potato yield response to omission of N, P, K, S and B compared to no fertilizer application treatment at final harvest in 2016 long rains (a) and 2016 short rains (b)

Figure 4. Percent potato yield response to omission of N, P, K, S and B compared to NPKSB treatment at 60 days after emergence in 2016 long rains (a) and 2016 short rains (b)

Figure 4. Percent potato yield response to omission of N, P, K, S and B compared to NPKSB treatment at 60 days after emergence in 2016 long rains (a) and 2016 short rains (b)

Figure 5. Percent potato yield response to omission of N, P, K, S and B compared to NPKSB treatment at final harvest in 2016 long rains (a) and 2016 short rains (b)

Figure 5. Percent potato yield response to omission of N, P, K, S and B compared to NPKSB treatment at final harvest in 2016 long rains (a) and 2016 short rains (b)

Figure 6. Regression of potato yields for various treatments against the environmental yield (EY) mean for the 2016 long and short rain seasons

Figure 6. Regression of potato yields for various treatments against the environmental yield (EY) mean for the 2016 long and short rain seasons