782
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ANIMAL HUSBANDRY & VETERINARY SCIENCE

Revealing of stomach histology of beta-agonist free, hygienic, and natural swine

ORCID Icon, , , , ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Article: 2208248 | Received 15 Aug 2022, Accepted 25 Apr 2023, Published online: 21 May 2023

Figures & data

Table 1. Information across beta-agonist free, hygienic, and natural swine farming methods

Figure 1. The histology presenting thickness of mucosa layer of swine’s stomachs in various regions including fundus, body, antrum, and pylorus of natural, beta-agonist free, and hygienic swine. Determined by scanning objective of 2.5× of microscope.

Figure 1. The histology presenting thickness of mucosa layer of swine’s stomachs in various regions including fundus, body, antrum, and pylorus of natural, beta-agonist free, and hygienic swine. Determined by scanning objective of 2.5× of microscope.

Figure 2. The histology presenting thickness of submucosa layer of swine’s stomachs in various regions including fundus, body, antrum, and pylorus of natural, beta-agonist free, and hygienic swine. Determined by scanning objective of 2.5× of microscope.

Figure 2. The histology presenting thickness of submucosa layer of swine’s stomachs in various regions including fundus, body, antrum, and pylorus of natural, beta-agonist free, and hygienic swine. Determined by scanning objective of 2.5× of microscope.

Figure 3. The histology presenting thickness of muscularis layer of swine’s stomachs in various regions including fundus, body, antrum, and pylorus of natural, beta-agonist free, and hygienic swine. Determined by scanning objective of 2.5× of microscope.

Figure 3. The histology presenting thickness of muscularis layer of swine’s stomachs in various regions including fundus, body, antrum, and pylorus of natural, beta-agonist free, and hygienic swine. Determined by scanning objective of 2.5× of microscope.

Figure 4. Histology of gastric glands in mucosa layer of swine’s stomachs in various regions including fundus, body, antrum, and pylorus of natural, beta-agonist free, and hygienic swine. Determined by scanning objective of 10× of microscope.

Figure 4. Histology of gastric glands in mucosa layer of swine’s stomachs in various regions including fundus, body, antrum, and pylorus of natural, beta-agonist free, and hygienic swine. Determined by scanning objective of 10× of microscope.

Figure 5. Morphology indicating inflammatory cells indicated as red circle and red blood cells indicated as black arrow in mucosa layer of swine’s stomachs in various regions including fundus, body, antrum, and pylorus of natural, beta-agonist free, and hygienic swine. Determined by scanning objective of 40x of microscope.

Figure 5. Morphology indicating inflammatory cells indicated as red circle and red blood cells indicated as black arrow in mucosa layer of swine’s stomachs in various regions including fundus, body, antrum, and pylorus of natural, beta-agonist free, and hygienic swine. Determined by scanning objective of 40x of microscope.

Figure 6. Morphology indicating inflammatory cells indicated as red circle and red blood cells indicated as black arrow in submucosa layer of swine’s stomachs in various regions including fundus, body, antrum, and pylorus of natural, beta-agonist free, and hygienic swine. Determined by scanning objective of 40x of microscope.

Figure 6. Morphology indicating inflammatory cells indicated as red circle and red blood cells indicated as black arrow in submucosa layer of swine’s stomachs in various regions including fundus, body, antrum, and pylorus of natural, beta-agonist free, and hygienic swine. Determined by scanning objective of 40x of microscope.

Figure 7. Comparisons of the thickness of fundus, body, antrum, and pylorus regions on mucosa, submucosa, and muscularis layers in swine. Comparisons of number of inflammatory and red blood cells in fundus, body, antrum, and pylorus regions on mucosa and submucosa layers in swine. Data are presented as mean ± S.D. **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.01, #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01, ###p < 0.001

Figure 7. Comparisons of the thickness of fundus, body, antrum, and pylorus regions on mucosa, submucosa, and muscularis layers in swine. Comparisons of number of inflammatory and red blood cells in fundus, body, antrum, and pylorus regions on mucosa and submucosa layers in swine. Data are presented as mean ± S.D. **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.01, #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01, ###p < 0.001

Data availability statement

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2023.2208248.