Impact of perceived internal respect on flourishing: A sequential mediation of organizational identification and energy

Figures & data

Figure 1. Theoretical model.

Table 1. Descriptive statistics and correlation’s matrix

Sr.	Variables	Mean	SD	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9
1	Gender	–	–	–
2	Marital status	–	–	0.128*	–
3	Age	33.56	8.45	0.319**	0.424**	–
4	Education	6.10	5.29	0.241**	0.127*	0.140**	–
5	Tenure	16.42	1.421	0.263**	0.321**	0.763**	0.224	–
6	PIR	3.979	0.545	−0.113	0.043	0.141*	−0.041	0.104	(.764)
7	OID	4.025	0.490	−0.011	−0.012	0.060	0.002	0.048	0.411**	(.740)
8	Energy	4.037	0.541	0.002	−0.005	0.114	0.020	0.101	0.626**	0.524**	(.815)
9	Flourishing	4.075	0.466	−0.074	−0.060	−0.041	−0.013	−0.025	0.544**	0.533**	0.513**	(.800)

Note: n = 250; Cronbach’s alphas are on the diagonal in parentheses;

*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.

Table 2. Multicollinearity and autocorrelation diagnostic

Variables	Collinearity statistics
	Tolerance	VIF
OID	0.714	1.401
Energy	0.523	1.914
PIR	0.599	1.670
Durbin–Watson statistic 1.903

Table 3. Fit statistics from measurement model comparison

Models	χ2	df	χ2/df	CFI	SRMR	RMSEA	Δχ2	Δdf	sig
Full measurement model	737.20	281	2.623	0.81	0.08	0.08			p < .001
One-factor model	1207.90	299	4.040	0.62	0.09	0.11	470.70	18	p < .001
Two-factor model	1068.23	298	3.585	0.68	0.09	0.10	331.03	17	p < .001
Three-factor model	1051.99	296	3.554	0.68	0.09	0.10	314.79	15	p < .001

Note: n = 250; all models are compared with the full measurement model.

χ2 = chi-square; df = degrees of freedom.

Table 4. Path coefficients and indirect effects for mediation models

	Path coefficient			Indirect effects
	PIR	OID	Energy	Flourishing	Estimate	Boot LL CI	Boot UL CI
From → To
PIR		.408***	.443***	.275***
OID			.291 ***	.282***
Energy				.133**
Total indirect effect					.691***	0.373	1.505
Indirect effect
PIR → OID → Flourishing					.419***	.243	.958
PIR → OID → Energy → Flourishing					.058***	.010	.200
PIR → Energy → Flourishing					.215***	.049	.633
Direct Effect
PIR → Flourishing					.275***	.186	.363
Total effect
PIR → Flourishing					.465 ***	.390	.540

Note: ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.05; LL = lower limit; UL = upper limit; CI = confidence interval.