1,809
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

An in vitro model to assess effects of a desensitising agent on bacterial biofilm formation

ORCID Icon, , &
Pages 1-8 | Received 20 May 2018, Accepted 31 Oct 2018, Published online: 24 Dec 2018

Figures & data

Table 1. Forward and reverse sequences of the primers MKD and SobGTFI.

Figure 1. Patent dentine tubules following etching of the dentine surface with 6% citric acid for 90 seconds.

Figure 1. Patent dentine tubules following etching of the dentine surface with 6% citric acid for 90 seconds.

Figure 2. SEM image of a CSPS plus fluoride treated sample following incubation showing occluded tubules and an altered surface layer.

Figure 2. SEM image of a CSPS plus fluoride treated sample following incubation showing occluded tubules and an altered surface layer.

Figure 3. SEM image of a pumice treated sample following intubation demonstrating the formation of an extracellular matrix (highlighted by arrow).

Figure 3. SEM image of a pumice treated sample following intubation demonstrating the formation of an extracellular matrix (highlighted by arrow).

Figure 4. qPCR estimates for the number of S. mutans and S. sobrinus bacteria per a sample. Error Bars represent one standard deviation from the mean.

Figure 4. qPCR estimates for the number of S. mutans and S. sobrinus bacteria per a sample. Error Bars represent one standard deviation from the mean.

Figure 5. Colony forming units estimated on each sample as the number per a disc for S. mutans and S. sobrinus. Error bars represent one standard deviation from the mean.

Figure 5. Colony forming units estimated on each sample as the number per a disc for S. mutans and S. sobrinus. Error bars represent one standard deviation from the mean.