An in vitro model to assess effects of a desensitising agent on bacterial biofilm formation

References

• Camilotti V, Zilly J, Busato Pdo M, et al. Desensitizing treatments for dentin hypersensitivity: a randomized, split-mouth clinical trial. Braz Oral Res. 2012;26:263–268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brannstrom M, Astrom A. A study on the mechanism of pain elicited from the dentin. J Dent Res. 1964;43:619–625.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earl JS, Leary RK, Muller KH, et al. Physical and chemical characterization of dentin surface following treatment with NovaMin technology. J Clin Dent. 2011;22:62–67.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• West NX, Macdonald EL, Jones SB, et al. Randomized in situ clinical study comparing the ability of two new desensitizing toothpaste technologies to occlude patent dentin tubules. J Clin Dent. 2011;22:82–89.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang Z, Sa Y, Sauro S, et al. Effect of desensitising toothpastes on dentinal tubule occlusion: a dentine permeability measurement and SEM in vitro study. J Dent. 2010;38:400–410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkinson CR, Willson RJ. A comparative in vitro study investigating the occlusion and mineralization properties of commercial toothpastes in a four-day dentin disc model. J Clin Dent. 2011;22:74–81.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hannig M, Fiebiger M, Guntzer M, et al. Protective effect of the in situ formed short-term salivary pellicle. Arch Oral Biol. 2004;49:903–910.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh PD. Dental plaque as a biofilm and a microbial community – implications for health and disease. BMC Oral Health. 2006;6 Suppl 1:S14.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cury MS, Silva CB, Nogueira RD, Campos MGD, Palma-Dibb RG, Geraldo-Martins VR. Surface roughness and bacterial adhesion on root dentin treated with diode laser and conventional desensitizing agents. Lasers Med Sci. 2018;33(2):257–262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Human Tissue Act. [cited 2018 Jan 23]. Available from: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2004/30/contents.
   Google Scholar
• Deng DM, ten Cate JM. Demineralization of dentin by Streptococcus mutans biofilms grown in the constant depth film fermentor. Caries Res. 2004;38:54–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratten J, Wills K, Barnett P, et al. In vitro studies of the effect of antiseptic-containing mouthwashes on the formation and viability of Streptococcus sanguis biofilms. J Appl Microbiol. 1998;84:1149–1155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murchison HH, Barrett JF, Cardineau GA, et al. Transformation of Streptococcus mutans with chromosomal and shuttle plasmid (pYA629) DNAs. Infect Immun. 1986;54:273–282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng DM, van Loveren C, ten Cate JM. Caries-preventive agents induce remineralization of dentin in a biofilm model. Caries Res. 2005;39:216–223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson M. Susceptibility of oral bacterial biofilms to antimicrobial agents. J Med Microbiol. 1996;44:79–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan TD, Wilson M. The effects of surface roughness and type of denture acrylic on biofilm formation by Streptococcus oralis in a constant depth film fermentor. J Appl Microbiol. 2001;91:47–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saraithong P, Pattanaporn K, Chen Z, et al. Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus sobrinus colonization and caries experience in 3- and 5-year-old Thai children. Clin Oral Investig. 2015;19:1955–1964.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiater A, Choma A, Szczodrak J. Insoluble glucans synthesized by cariogenic Streptococci: a structural study. J Basic Microbiol. 1999;39:265–273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forssten SD, Bjorklund M, Ouwehand AC. Streptococcus mutans, caries and simulation models. Nutrients. 2010;2:290–298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auschill TM, Arweiler NB, Netuschil L, et al. Spatial distribution of vital and dead microorganisms in dental biofilms. Arch Oral Biol. 2001;46:471–476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yurdaguven H, Aykor A, Ozel E, et al. Influence of a prophylaxis paste on surface roughness of different composites, porcelain, enamel and dentin surfaces. Eur J Dent. 2012;6:1–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bollen CM, Lambrechts P, Quirynen M. Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: a review of the literature. Dent Mater. 1997;13:258–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teughels W, Van Assche N, Sliepen I, et al. Effect of material characteristics and/or surface topography on biofilm development. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006;17 Suppl 2:68–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Loveren C. Antimicrobial activity of fluoride and its in vivo importance: identification of research questions. Caries Res. 2001;35 Suppl 1:65–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar