Figures & data
Figure 2. Proposed SEM model indicating the contributions of Ecosystem services (ES), Ecosystem disservices (EdS) and Relational values (RV) to Human well-being (HWB) and the relations between latent and manifest variables. Note that ovals represent latent variables (i.e. unobserved constructs), while the rectangles represent manifest variables collected in the survey.
![Figure 2. Proposed SEM model indicating the contributions of Ecosystem services (ES), Ecosystem disservices (EdS) and Relational values (RV) to Human well-being (HWB) and the relations between latent and manifest variables. Note that ovals represent latent variables (i.e. unobserved constructs), while the rectangles represent manifest variables collected in the survey.](/cms/asset/5fe903a1-f2bb-4ac2-b30e-6342df8d86af/tbsm_a_2097477_f0002_b.gif)
Figure 3. Perception of positive contributions of different ecosystems to human well-being (HWB) identified by the BMA population. TDF: tropical dry forest.
![Figure 3. Perception of positive contributions of different ecosystems to human well-being (HWB) identified by the BMA population. TDF: tropical dry forest.](/cms/asset/7837f359-84d7-44b9-938b-201eb59d5c08/tbsm_a_2097477_f0003_oc.jpg)
Figure 4. Ecosystems contribution to human well-being (HWB) in BMA: positive contributions (grouped in provisioning, regulating and cultural services) and negative contributions (disservices). TDF: tropical dry forest.
![Figure 4. Ecosystems contribution to human well-being (HWB) in BMA: positive contributions (grouped in provisioning, regulating and cultural services) and negative contributions (disservices). TDF: tropical dry forest.](/cms/asset/354a344c-8bf7-447a-9775-9dab33eebc0d/tbsm_a_2097477_f0004_oc.jpg)
Figure 5. Negative contribution of ecosystems to human well-being (HWB) identified by the BMA population. TDF: tropical dry forest.
![Figure 5. Negative contribution of ecosystems to human well-being (HWB) identified by the BMA population. TDF: tropical dry forest.](/cms/asset/4e5f201e-bcda-42ed-b3dc-78557a9c6693/tbsm_a_2097477_f0005_oc.jpg)
Figure 6. Scatter plot representing the perceived importance (X-axis) and vulnerability (Y-axis) of the ecosystem services and disservices in BMA.
![Figure 6. Scatter plot representing the perceived importance (X-axis) and vulnerability (Y-axis) of the ecosystem services and disservices in BMA.](/cms/asset/4a6648d3-c767-488d-b7e3-17b2c5d33935/tbsm_a_2097477_f0006_oc.jpg)
Table 1. Structural Equation Model estimates, standard errors (S.E.), z-values, p-values, standardized coefficients, R2, and model goodness-of-fit indicators CFI (Comparative fit index) and TLI (Tucker Lewis Index).
Figure 7. (a) Contribution of Ecosystem services (ES), Ecosystem disservices (EdS) and Relational values (RV) to Human well-being (HWB) and standardized factor loadings of the second-order latent variable (ES). (b) Contribution of Ecosystem services (ES), Ecosystem disservices (EdS) and Relational values (RV) and Socio-economic factors (income and education) to Human well-being (HWB). CMW: current minimum wage. 0.01<*p values ≤0.05; 0.001<**p values≤0.01; ***p values ≤0.001.
![Figure 7. (a) Contribution of Ecosystem services (ES), Ecosystem disservices (EdS) and Relational values (RV) to Human well-being (HWB) and standardized factor loadings of the second-order latent variable (ES). (b) Contribution of Ecosystem services (ES), Ecosystem disservices (EdS) and Relational values (RV) and Socio-economic factors (income and education) to Human well-being (HWB). CMW: current minimum wage. 0.01<*p values ≤0.05; 0.001<**p values≤0.01; ***p values ≤0.001.](/cms/asset/d321c66c-de24-4cbb-8a2c-ef1cc675029a/tbsm_a_2097477_f0007_b.gif)
Table 2. SEM-MIMIC results.