Unpacking the complexity of nature´s contributions to human well-being: lessons to transform the Barranquilla Metropolitan Area into a BiodiverCity

References

• Aguado M 2016. Vivir bien en un planeta finito: una mirada socio-ecologica al concepto de bienestar humano [ Doctoral Dissertation]. Universidad Autonoma de Madrid.
   Google Scholar
• Aldana-Domínguez J, Montes C, Martínez M, Medina N, Hahn J, Duque M. 2017. Biodiversity and ecosystem services knowledge in the Colombian Caribbean: progress and challenges. Trop Conserv Sci. 10. doi:10.1177/1940082917714229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldana-Domínguez J, Montes C, González JA. 2018. Understanding the past to envision a sustainable future: a social–ecological history of the Barranquilla Metropolitan Area (Colombia). Sustainability. 10(7):2247. doi:10.3390/su10072247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldana-Domínguez J, Palomo I, Gutiérrez-Angonese J, Arnaiz-Schmitz C, Montes C, Narvaez F. 2019. Assessing the effects of past and future land cover changes in ecosystem services, disservices and biodiversity: a case study in Barranquilla Metropolitan Area (BMA). Colombia Ecosyst Serv. 37:100915. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100915.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amaya J, Delgado-Lindeman M, Arellana J, Allen J. 2021. Urban freight logistics: what do citizens perceive? Transp Res Part E Logist Transp Rev. 152:102390. doi:10.1016/j.tre.2021.102390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anguelovski I, Brand AL, Connolly JJ, Corbera E, Kotsila P, Steil J, Garcia-Lamarca M, Triguero-Mas M, Cole H, Baró F, et al. 2020. Expanding the boundaries of justice in urban greening scholarship: toward an emancipatory, antisubordination, intersectional, and relational approach. Ann Am Assoc Geogr. 110(6):1743–1769. doi:10.1080/24694452.2020.1740579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balvanera P, Uriarte M, Almeida-Leñero L, Altesor A, DeClerck F, Gardner T, Hall J, Lara A, Laterra P, Peña-Claros M, et al. 2012. Ecosystem services research in Latin America: the state of the art. Ecosyst Serv. 2:56–70. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.09.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balzano S, Trinchera L. 2011. Structural equation models and student evaluation of teaching: a PLS Path Modeling Study. In: Attanasio M, Capursi V, editors. Statistical methods for the evaluation of university systems. Berlin, Germany: Springer Physica-Verlag Heidelberg. doi:10.1007/978-3-7908-2375-2.
   Google Scholar
• Blythe J, Armitage D, Alonso G, Campbell D, Esteves Dias AC, Epstein G, Marschke M, Nayak P. 2020. Frontiers in coastal well-being and ecosystem services research: a systematic review. Ocean Coast Manag. 185:1–10. doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.105028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BqCV. 2017. Informe de Calidad de Vida 2008-2016. Programa Barranquilla Cómo Vamos -10 años.
   Google Scholar
• Bratman GN, Daily GC, Levy BJ, Gross JJ. 2015. The benefits of nature experience: improved affect and cognition. Landsc Urban Plan. 138:41–50. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.02.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryan BA, Raymond CM, Crossman ND, Macdonald DH. 2010. Targeting the management of ecosystem services based on social values: where, what, and how? Landsc Urban Plan. 97(2):111–122. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.05.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calderón-Argelich A, Benetti S, Anguelovski I, Connolly JJT, Langemeyer J, Baró F. 2021. Tracing and building up environmental justice considerations in the urban ecosystem service literature: a systematic review. Landsc Urban Plan. 214:104130. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campagne CS, Roche PK, Salles JM. 2018. Looking into Pandora’s Box: ecosystem disservices assessment and correlations with ecosystem services. Ecosyst Serv. 30:126–136. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.02.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cebrián-Piqueras MA, Karrasch L, Kleyer M. 2017. Coupling stakeholder assessments of ecosystem services with biophysical ecosystem properties reveals importance of social contexts. Ecosyst Serv. 23:108–115. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.11.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan KMA, Balvanera P, Benessaiah K, Chapman M, Díaz S, Gómez-Baggethun E, Gould R, Hannahs N, Jax K, Klain S, et al. 2016. Opinion: why protect nature? Rethinking values and the environment. Proc Natl Acad Sci. doi:10.1073/pnas.1525002113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruz-Garcia GS, Sachet E, Blundo-Canto G, Vanegas M, Quintero M. 2017. To what extent have the links between ecosystem services and human well-being been researched in Africa, Asia, and Latin America? Ecosyst Serv. 25:201–212. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.04.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DANE. 2010. Population estimates 1985-2005 and municipal total population projections 2005-2020 by area. Bogotá, Colombia: Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística.
   Google Scholar
• DANE. 2017. Monetary and multidimensional poverty in Colombia 2016. Bogotá, Colombia: Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística.
   Google Scholar
• de Barranquilla A. 2020. Plan de desarrollo distrital de Barranquilla 2020-2023. Gac Distrial. 665:569.
   Google Scholar
• Delgado LE, Marín VH. 2016. Well-Being and the use of ecosystem services by rural households of the Río Cruces watershed, southern Chile. Ecosyst Serv. 21:81–91. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.07.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Díaz S, Pascual U, Stenseke M, Martín-López B, Watson RT, Molnár Z, Hill R, Chan KMA, Baste IA, Brauman KA, et al. 2018. Assessing nature’s contributions to people. Science. 359(6373):270–272. doi:10.1126/science.aap8826.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diener E, Sandvik E, Seidlitz L, and Diener M 1993. The relationship between income and subjective well-being: Relative or absolute?. Soc Indic Res. 28(3):195–223. doi:10.1007/BF01079018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diener E, Seligman MEP. 2004. Beyond money: toward an economy of well-being. Psychol Sci Public Interest. 5(1):1–31. doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00501001.x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dinnie E, Brown KM, Morris S. 2013. Community, cooperation and conflict: negotiating the social well-being benefits of urban greenspace experiences. Landsc Urban Plan. 112:1–9. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.12.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobbs C, Escobedo FJ, Zipperer WC. 2011. A framework for developing urban forest ecosystem services and goods indicators. Landsc Urban Plan. 99(3–4):196–206. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.11.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duraiappah AKA. 2011. Ecosystem services and human well-being: do global findings make any sense? Bioscience. 61(1):7–8. doi:10.1525/bio.2011.61.1.2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eigenbrod F, Bell VA, Davies HN, Heinemeyer A, Armsworth PR, Gaston KJ. 2011. The impact of projected increases in urbanization on ecosystem services. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 278(1722):3201–3208. doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.2754.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escobedo FJ, Kroeger T, Wagner JE. 2011. Urban forests and pollution mitigation: analyzing ecosystem services and disservices. Environ Pollut. 159(8–9):2078–2087. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2011.01.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagerholm N, Martín‐López B, Torralba M, Oteros‐rozas E, Lechner AM, Bieling C, Stahl Olafsson A, Albert C, Raymond CM, Garcia-Martin M, et al. 2020. Perceived contributions of multifunctional landscapes to human well‐being: evidence from 13 European sites. People Nat. 2(1):217–234. doi:10.1002/pan3.10067.
   Google Scholar
• Felipe-Lucia MR, Martín-López B, Lavorel S, Berraquero-Díaz L, Escalera-Reyes J, Comín FA, Margalida A. 2015. Ecosystem services flows: why stakeholders’ power relationships matter. PLoS One. 10(7):1–21. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0132232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer C, Gayer C, Kurucz K, Riesch F, Tscharntke T, Batáry P, Rhodes J. 2018. Ecosystem services and disservices provided by small rodents in arable fields: effects of local and landscape management. J Appl Ecol. 55(2):548–558. doi:10.1111/1365-2664.13016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frumkin H, Bratman GN, Breslow SJ, Cochran B, Kahn PH, Lawler JJ, Levin PS, Tandon PS, Varanasi U, Wolf KL, et al. 2017. Nature contact and human health: a research agenda. Environ Health Perspect. 125(7):1–18. doi:10.1289/EHP1663.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galvis L. 2009. Geografía económica del Caribe Continental. Doc Trab Sobre Econ Reg. 119:1–77.
   Google Scholar
• García-Llorente M, Castro JA, Quintas-Soriano C, Oteros-Rozas E, Iniesta-Arandia I, González J, García Del Amo D, Hernández-Arroyo M, Casado-Arzuaga I, Palomo I, et al. 2020. Local perceptions of ecosystem services across multiple ecosystem types in Spain. Land. 9(9):330. doi:10.3390/land9090330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gascon M, Zijlema W, Vert C, White MP, Nieuwenhuijsen MJ. 2017. Outdoor blue spaces, human health and well-being: a systematic review of quantitative studies. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 220(8):1207–1221. doi:10.1016/j.ijheh.2017.08.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez-Baggethun E, Barton DN. 2013. Classifying and valuing ecosystem services for urban planning. Ecol Econ. 86:235–245. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.08.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-García A, Palomo I, González JA, García-Díez V, García-Llorente M, Montes C. 2022. Biodiversity and ecosystem services mapping: can it reconcile urban and protected area planning? Sci Total Environ. 803:150048. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150048.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grace JB, Schoolmaster DR, Guntenspergen GR, Little AM, Mitchell BR, Miller KM, Schweiger EW. 2012. Guidelines for a graph-theoretic implementation of structural equation modeling. Ecosphere. 3(8):1–44. doi:10.1890/ES12-00048.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grace JB, Anderson TM, Seabloom EW, Borer ET, Adler PB, Harpole WS, Hautier Y, Hillebrand H, Lind EM, Pärtel M, et al. 2016. Integrative modelling reveals mechanisms linking productivity and plant species richness. Nature. 529(7586):390–393. doi:10.1038/nature16524.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guardiola J, Guillen-Royo M. 2015. Income, unemployment, higher education and wellbeing in times of economic crisis: evidence from Granada (Spain). Soc Indic Res. 120(2):395–409. doi:10.1007/s11205-014-0598-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haines-Young R, Potschin-Young M. 2018. Revision of the Common International Classification for Ecosystem Services (CICES V5.1): a policy brief. One Ecosyst. 3:e27108. doi:10.3897/oneeco.3.e27108.
   Google Scholar
• Hair J, Hult T, Ringle C, Sarstedt M. 2016. A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage publications. doi:10.1080/1743727x.2015.1005806.
   Google Scholar
• Himes A, Muraca B. 2018. Relational values: the key to pluralistic valuation of ecosystem services. Curr Opin Environ Sustainability. 35:1–7. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2018.09.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooper D, Coughlan J, Mullen MR. 2008. Structural equation modelling: guidelines for determining model fit. Electron J Bus Res Methods. 6:53–60. doi:10.21427/D79B73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu LT, Bentler PM. 1999. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equation Model a Multidiscip J. 6(1):1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang Q, Yin D, He C, Yan J, Liu Z, Meng S, Ren Q, Zhao R, Inostroza L. 2020. Linking ecosystem services and subjective well-being in rapidly urbanizing watersheds: insights from a multilevel linear model. Ecosyst Serv. 43:101106. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iniesta-Arandia I, García-Llorente M, Aguilera PA, Montes C, Martín-López B. 2014. Socio-Cultural valuation of ecosystem services: uncovering the links between values, drivers of change, and human well-being. Ecol Econ. 108:36–48. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.09.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IPBES. 2019. Global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Bonn, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Isbell F, Gonzalez A, Loreau M, Cowles J, Díaz S, Hector A, MacE GM, Wardle DA, O’-Connor MI, Duffy JE, et al. 2017. Linking the influence and dependence of people on biodiversity across scales. Nature. 546(7656):65–72. doi:10.1038/nature22899.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keeler BL, Hamel P, McPhearson T, Hamann MH, Donahue ML, Meza Prado KA, Arkems KK, Bratman GN, Brauman KA, Finlay JC, et al. 2019. Social-Ecological and technological factors moderate the value of urban nature. Nat Sustain. 2(1):29–38. doi:10.1038/s41893-018-0202-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King MF, Renó VF, Novo EMLM. 2014. The concept, dimensions and methods of assessment of human well-being within a socioecological context: a literature review. Soc Indic Res. 116(3):681–698. doi:10.1007/s11205-013-0320-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson LR, Jennings V, Cloutier SA, Lepczyk CA. 2016. Public parks and wellbeing in urban areas of the United States. PLoS One. 11(4):1–19. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0153211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu H, Hu Y, Li F, Yuan L. 2018. Associations of multiple ecosystem services and disservices of urban park ecological infrastructure and the linkages with socioeconomic factors. J Clean Prod. 174:868–879. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucchesi ST, Larranaga AM, Ochoa JAA, Samios AAB, Cybis HBB. 2021. The role of security and walkability in subjective wellbeing: a multigroup analysis among different age cohorts. Res Transp Bus Manag. 40:100559. doi:10.1016/j.rtbm.2020.100559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyytimäki J, Sipilä M. 2009. Hopping on one leg – the challenge of ecosystem disservices for urban green management. Urban for Urban Green. 8(4):309–315. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2009.09.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MA. 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: current state and trends. Washington, DC, USA: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maass JM, Balvanera P, Castillo A, Daily GC, Mooney HA, Ehrlich P, Quesada M, Miranda A, Jaramillo VJ, García-Oliva F, et al. 2005. Ecosystem services of tropical dry forests : insights from long- term ecological and social research on the Pacific Coast of Mexico. Ecol Soc. 10(1):17. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss1/art17/.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacCallum RC, Austin JT. 2000. Applications of Structural Equation Modeling in psychological research. Ann Rev Psychol. 51(1):201–226. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandle L, Shields-Estrada A, Chaplin-Kramer R. et al. 2021. Increasing decision relevance of ecosystem service science. Nat Sustain. 4:161–169. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-00625-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martín-López B, Iniesta-Arandia I, García-Llorente M, Palomo I, Casado-Arzuaga I, Del Amo DG, Gómez-Baggethun E, Oteros-Rozas E, Palacios-Agundez I, Willaarts B, et al. 2012. Uncovering ecosystem service bundles through social preferences. PLoS One. 7(6):1–11. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0038970.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKinney ML. 2002. Urbanization, biodiversity and conservation. Bioscience. 52(10):883–890. doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0883:UBAC]2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible. 2019a. Barranquilla se convertirá en la primera ‘Biodiverciudad’ del Caribe colombiano. https://www.minambiente.gov.co/bosques-biodiversidad-y-servicios-ecosistemicos/barranquilla-se-convertira-en-la-primera-biodiverciudad-del-caribe-colombiano/
   Google Scholar
• Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible. 2019b. Biodiverciudades. Asuntos Ambientales sectoriales y urbanos. Bogotá. https://www.dnp.gov.co/Crecimiento-Verde/Documents/ComiteSostenibilidad/Presentaciones/Sesión1/4_Iniciativa_biodiverciudades.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mukherjee N, Sutherland WJ, Dicks L, Hugé J, Koedam N, Dahdouh-Guebas F. 2014. Ecosystem service valuations of mangrove ecosystems to inform decision making and future valuation exercises. PLoS One. 9(9):9. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0107706.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naidoo R, Gerkey D, Hole D, Pfaff A, Ellis AM, Golden CD, Herrera D, Johnson K, Mulligan M, Ricketts TH, et al. 2019. Evaluating the impacts of protected areas on human well-being across the developing world. Sci Adv. 5(4):1–8. doi:10.1126/sciadv.aav3006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Of Barranquilla A, 2012. Territorial ordering plan. 2012-2032. Technical support document.
   Google Scholar
• Oh B, Lee KJ, Zaslawski C, Yeung A, Rosenthal D, Larkey L, Back M. 2017. Health and well-being benefits of spending time in forests: Systematic review. Environ Health Prev Med. 22(1):1–11. doi:10.1186/s12199-017-0677-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padilla JC, Lizarazo FE, Murillo OL, Mendigaña FA, Pachón E, Vera MJ. 2017. Epidemiología de las principales enfermedades transmitidas por vectores en Colombia, 1990-2016. Biomedica. 37:27–40. doi:10.7705/biomedica.v37i0.3769.
   Google Scholar
• Palomo I, Martin-Lopez B, Lopez-Santiago C, Montes C. 2011. Participatory scenario planning for protected areas management under the ecosystem services framework: the Doñana Social-Ecological System in Southwestern Spain. Ecol Soc. 16(1):23. doi:10.5751/ES-03862-160123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palomo I, Felipe-Lucia MR, Bennett EM, Martín-López B, Pascual U. 2016. Disentangling the pathways and effects of ecosystem service co-production. Adv Ecol Res. doi:10.1016/bs.aecr.2015.09.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paudyal K, Baral H, Keenan RJ. 2018. Assessing social values of ecosystem services in the Phewa Lake Watershed, Nepal. For Policy Econ. 90:67–81. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2018.01.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng J, Tian L, Liu Y, Zhao M, Hu Y, Wu J. 2017. Ecosystem services response to urbanization in metropolitan areas: thresholds identification. Sci Total Environ. 607–608:706–714. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.06.218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira E, Queirós C, Pereira H, Vicente L. 2005. Ecosystem services and human well – being: a participatory study in a mountain community in Northern Portugal. 10:1–26. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss2/art14/.
   Google Scholar
• Prévot AC, Cheval H, Raymond R, Cosquer A. 2018. Routine experiences of nature in cities can increase personal commitment toward biodiversity conservation. Biol Conserv. 226:1–8. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2018.07.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2013. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: Foundation for Statistical Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Raudsepp-Hearne C, Peterson GD, Tengö M, Bennett EM, Holland T, Benessaiah K, MacDonald GK, Pfeifer L. 2010. Untangling the environmentalist’s paradox: why is human well-being increasing as ecosystem services degrade? BioScience. 60(8):576–589. doi:10.1525/bio.2010.60.8.4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reyers B, Nel JL, O’-Farrell PJ, Sitas N, Nel DC. 2015. Navigating complexity through knowledge coproduction: mainstreaming ecosystem services into disaster risk reduction. Proc Nat Acad Sci. 112(24):7362–7368. doi:10.1073/pnas.1414374112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reyes-García V, Babigumira R, Pyhälä A, Wunder S, Zorondo-Rodríguez F, Angelsen A. 2016. Subjective wellbeing and income: empirical patterns in the rural developing world. J Happiness Stud. 17(2):773–791. doi:10.1007/s10902-014-9608-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rojas C, Aldana-Dominguez J, Munizaga J, Moschella P, Martinez C, Stamm C. 2020. Urban wetland trends in Three Latin American cities during the latest decades (2002-2019): Concón (Chile), Barranquilla (Colombia), and Lima (Peru). Wetl Sci Pract. 37:283–293.
   Google Scholar
• Rosseel Y. 2012. Lavaan an R package for Structural Equation Modeling. J Stat Softw. 48(2):1–36. doi:10.18637/jss.v048.i02.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell R, Guerry AD, Balvanera P, Gould RK, Basurto X, Chan KMA, Klain S, Levine J, Tam J. 2013. Humans and nature: how knowing and experiencing nature affect well-being. Annu Rev Environ Resour. 38(1):473–502. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-012312-110838.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandom C, Dalby L, Flojgaard C, Kissling WD, Lenoir J, Sandel B, Trojelsgaard K, Ejrnas R, Svenning JC. 2013. Mammal predator and prey species richness are strongly linked at macroscales. Ecology. 94(5):1112–1122. doi:10.1890/12-1342.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos-Martín F, Martín-López B, García-Llorente M, Aguado M, Benayas J, Montes C. 2013. Unraveling the relationships between ecosystems and human wellbeing in Spain. PLoS One. 8(9):8. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0073249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schell CJ, Dyson K, Fuentes TL, Des Roches S, Harris NC, Miller DS, Woelfle-Erskine CA, Lambert MR. 2020. The ecological and evolutionary consequences of systemic racism in urban environments. Science. 369(6510):6510. doi:10.1126/science.aay4497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schubert H, Calvo AC, Rauchecker M, Rojas-Zamora O, Brokamp G, Schütt B. 2018. Assessment of land cover changes in the hinterland of Barranquilla (Colombia) using landsat imagery and logistic regression. Land. 7(4):1–24. doi:10.3390/land7040152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz PW, Tabanico J. 2007. Self, identity, and the natural environment: exploring implicit connections with nature. J Appl Soc Psychol. 37(6):1219–1247. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2007.00210.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulz C, Martin-Ortega J. 2018. Quantifying relational values—why not? Curr Opin Environ Sustainability. 35:15–21. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2018.10.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scopelliti M, Carrus G, Adinolfi C, Suarez G, Colangelo G, Lafortezza R, Panno A, Sanesi G. 2016. Staying in touch with nature and well-being in different income groups: the experience of urban parks in Bogotá. Landsc Urban Plan. 148:139–148. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• See SC, Shaikh SFEA, Jaung W, Carrasco LR. 2020. Are relational values different in practice to instrumental values? Ecosyst Serv. 44:101132. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SNEA. 2014. Spanish National Ecoystem Assessment. Ecosystems and biodiversity for human wellbeing. Synthesis of the key findings.
   Google Scholar
• Soga M, Gaston KJ. 2016. Extinction of experience: the loss of human-nature interactions. Front Ecol Environ. 14(2):94–101. doi:10.1002/fee.1225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Summers JK, Smith LM, Case JL, Linthurst RA. 2012. A review of the elements of human well-being with an emphasis on the contribution of ecosystem services. Ambio. 41(4):327–340. doi:10.1007/s13280-012-0256-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutherland IJ, Villamagna AM, Dallaire CO, Bennett EM, Chin ATM, Yeung ACY, Lamothe KA, Tomscha SA, Cormier R. 2018. Undervalued and under pressure: a plea for greater attention toward regulating ecosystem services. Ecol Indic. 94:23–32. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.06.047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sykes O, Demaziere C, Nurse A. 2020. Introduction ‘Green cities’ as urban models: contributing to new urban agendas, but how? Town Plan Rev. 91(4):349–355. doi:10.3828/tpr.2020.20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian Y, Wu H, Zhang G, Wang L, Zheng D, Li S. 2020. Perceptions of ecosystem services, disservices and willingness-to-pay for urban green space conservation. J Environ Manage. 260:110140. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations, Department of Economic Affairs, Population Division. 2019. World urbanization prospects: the 2018 revision (ST/ESA/SER.A/420). United Nation, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Venter ZS, Shackleton C, Van Staden F, Selomane O, Masterson VA. 2020. Green Apartheid: urban green infrastructure remains unequally distributed across income and race geographies in South Africa. Landsc Urban Plan. 203:103889. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103889.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vilardy SP, González JA, Martín-López B, Montes C. 2011. Relationships between hydrological regime and ecosystem services supply in a Caribbean coastal wetland: a social-ecological approach. Hydrol Sci J. 56(8):1423–1435. doi:10.1080/02626667.2011.631497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Döhren P, Haase D. 2015. Ecosystem disservices research: a review of the state of the art with a focus on cities. Ecol Indic. 52:490–497. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.12.027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wakita K, Shen Z, Oishi T, Yagi N, Kurokura H, Furuya K. 2014. Human utility of marine ecosystem services and behavioural intentions for marine conservation in Japan. Mar Policy. 46:53–60. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2013.12.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei Z, Zhang F, Zhou L, Li Y. 2019. Migration of rural residents to urban areas drives grassland vegetation increase in China’s Loess Plateau. Sustainability. 11(23):6764. doi:10.3390/su11236764.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO. 2017. Urban green space interventions and health. Reg. Off. Eur. Copenhagen. http://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/environment-and-health/urban-health/publications/2017/urban-green-space-interventions-and-health-a-review-of-impacts-and-effectiveness.-full-report-2017
   Google Scholar
• Wilson EO. 1984. Biophilia: the human bond with other species. Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard.
   Google Scholar
• Yang W, Dietz T, Liu W, Luo J, Liu J. 2013. Going beyond the millennium ecosystem assessment: an index system of human dependence on ecosystem services. PLoS One. 8:1–9. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0064581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang YCE, Passarelli S, Lovell RJ, Ringler C. 2018. Gendered perspectives of ecosystem services: a systematic review. Ecosyst Serv. 31:58–67. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.03.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang W, Ricketts TH, Kremen C, Carney K, Swinton SM. 2007. Ecosystem services and dis-services to agriculture. Ecol Econ. 64(2):253–260. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.02.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmermann-Teixeira F, Bachi L, Blanco J, Zimmermann I, Welle I, Carvalho-Ribeiro SM. 2019. Perceived ecosystem services (ES) and ecosystem disservices (EDS) from trees: insights from three case studies in Brazil and France. Landsc Ecol. 34(7):1583–1600. doi:10.1007/s10980-019-00778-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar