1,298
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Materials/process modeling and simulation

Data-driven estimation of plastic properties in work-hardening model combining power-law and linear hardening using instrumented indentation test

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 416-424 | Received 28 Jun 2022, Accepted 22 Sep 2022, Published online: 17 Oct 2022

Figures & data

Figure 1. Stress–plastic strain curves of two simplest and proposed work-hardening models estimated from instrumented indentation test.

Figure 1. Stress–plastic strain curves of two simplest and proposed work-hardening models estimated from instrumented indentation test.

Figure 2. Finite element model of instrumented indentation test.

Figure 2. Finite element model of instrumented indentation test.

Figure 3. Response surfaces of normalized loading curvature and pile-up height for σ0, n, and Hpin E=200 GPa and ν=0.3. Surface of Hp=915.78 MPa was indicated to use for validation.

Figure 3. Response surfaces of normalized loading curvature and pile-up height for σ0, n, and Hpin E=200 GPa and ν=0.3. Surface of Hp=915.78 MPa was indicated to use for validation.

Figure 4. Response surfaces for power-low hardening (E=200 GPa, ν=0.3, and Hp=0 MPa). Black lines and a rhomboid mark were drawn for validation.

Figure 4. Response surfaces for power-low hardening (E=200 GPa, ν=0.3, and Hp=0 MPa). Black lines and a rhomboid mark were drawn for validation.

Figure 5. Response surfaces for power-low hardening (E=200 GPa, ν=0.3, and n=0). Black lines and a rhomboid mark were drawn for validation.

Figure 5. Response surfaces for power-low hardening (E=200 GPa, ν=0.3, and n=0). Black lines and a rhomboid mark were drawn for validation.

Figure 6. Experimental results.

Figure 6. Experimental results.

Table 1. Experimental results of loading curvatures and pile-up heights: data of 12 indentation tests.

Table 2. Experimental results of loading curvatures and pile-up heights: average value and deviations of 12 indentation tests.

Figure 7. Stress–plastic strain curves of two simplest work-hardening models estimated from instrumented indentation test.

Figure 7. Stress–plastic strain curves of two simplest work-hardening models estimated from instrumented indentation test.

Figure 8. Response surfaces for combined hardening model (E=200 GPa, ν=0.3, and Hp=915.8 MPa).

Figure 8. Response surfaces for combined hardening model (E=200 GPa, ν=0.3, and Hp=915.8 MPa).

Figure 9. Validation: simulation results using estimated material constants.

Figure 9. Validation: simulation results using estimated material constants.

Figure 10. Validation: stress–strain curves estimated from instrumented indentation test.

Figure 10. Validation: stress–strain curves estimated from instrumented indentation test.