Figures & data
![](/cms/asset/64b93ef2-f87e-4618-9537-cfd3c2a04df4/tstm_a_2129508_uf0001_oc.jpg)
Figure 1. Stress–plastic strain curves of two simplest and proposed work-hardening models estimated from instrumented indentation test.
![Figure 1. Stress–plastic strain curves of two simplest and proposed work-hardening models estimated from instrumented indentation test.](/cms/asset/2ad0aaf5-cef3-4b34-9167-4f13779edb27/tstm_a_2129508_f0001_oc.jpg)
Figure 3. Response surfaces of normalized loading curvature and pile-up height for ,
, and
in
GPa and
. Surface of
MPa was indicated to use for validation.
![Figure 3. Response surfaces of normalized loading curvature and pile-up height for σ0, n, and Hpin E=200 GPa and ν=0.3. Surface of Hp=915.78 MPa was indicated to use for validation.](/cms/asset/08d22a4f-72c9-4367-bda8-ff2250d6ed26/tstm_a_2129508_f0003_oc.jpg)
Figure 4. Response surfaces for power-low hardening ( GPa,
, and
MPa). Black lines and a rhomboid mark were drawn for validation.
![Figure 4. Response surfaces for power-low hardening (E=200 GPa, ν=0.3, and Hp=0 MPa). Black lines and a rhomboid mark were drawn for validation.](/cms/asset/91907731-0a03-47d6-9a88-d9e31ce9626a/tstm_a_2129508_f0004_oc.jpg)
Figure 5. Response surfaces for power-low hardening ( GPa,
, and
). Black lines and a rhomboid mark were drawn for validation.
![Figure 5. Response surfaces for power-low hardening (E=200 GPa, ν=0.3, and n=0). Black lines and a rhomboid mark were drawn for validation.](/cms/asset/3fe2cd9d-7545-4ca5-a3aa-c10eb70734b8/tstm_a_2129508_f0005_oc.jpg)
Table 1. Experimental results of loading curvatures and pile-up heights: data of 12 indentation tests.
Table 2. Experimental results of loading curvatures and pile-up heights: average value and deviations of 12 indentation tests.