542
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Pure Mathematics

A novel algorithm for singularly perturbed parabolic differential-difference equations

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon | (Reviewing editor:)
Article: 2133211 | Received 19 Aug 2022, Accepted 30 Sep 2022, Published online: 04 Dec 2022

Figures & data

Table 1. Eε,δ,ηN,τ,rε,δ,ηN,τ EN,τ, rN,τ (Eε,δ,ηN,τ)extp (rε,δ,ηN,τ)extp, (EN,τ)extp and (rN,τ)extp for Example, 5.1 using method (3.19) and scheme(3.19) with Richardson extrapolation (4.10) with δ=η=0.5×ε

Table 2. Eε,δ,ηN,τ,rε,δ,ηN,τ EN,τ, rN,τ (Eε,δ,ηN,τ)extp (rε,δ,ηN,τ)extp, (EN,τ)extp and (rN,τ)extp for Example, 5.2 using method (3.19) and scheme(3.19) with Richardson extrapolation (4.10) with δ=η=0.5×ε,M=N

Table 3. Eε,δ,ηN,τ,rε,δ,ηN,τ EN,τ, rN,τ (Eε,δ,ηN,τ)extp (rε,δ,ηN,τ)extp, (EN,τ)extp and (rN,τ)extp for Example, 5.3 using method (3.19) and method (3.19) with Richardson extrapolation (4.10) with T=1.0,δ=η=0.5×ε

Table 4. (Eε,δ,ηN,τ)extp (rε,δ,ηN,τ)extp, (EN,τ)extp and (rN,τ)extp for Example, 5.1 using proposed method (3.19) with Richardson extrapolation (4.10) and results in (Mesfin M. Woldaregay & Duressa, Citation2019) and (Woldaregay & Duressa, Citation2020) with T=3,δ=0.6×ε,η=0.5×ε

Figure 1. The effect of ε on the solution profiles at δ=0.6×ε and η=0.5×ε.

Figure 1. The effect of ε on the solution profiles at δ=0.6×ε and η=0.5×ε.

Figure 2. The effect of δ on the solution profiles at ε=24,η=0.5×ε.

Figure 2. The effect of δ on the solution profiles at ε=2−4,η=0.5×ε.

Figure 3. The effect of η on the solution profiles with ε=24,δ=0.6×ε.

Figure 3. The effect of η on the solution profiles with ε=2−4,δ=0.6×ε.

Figure 4. Numerical solution profiles for Example, 5.1 at δ=0.6×ε,η=0.5×ε,N=M=512.

Figure 4. Numerical solution profiles for Example, 5.1 at δ=0.6×ε,η=0.5×ε,N=M=512.

Figure 5. Numerical solution profiles for Example, (5.2) at T=2.0,δ=0.6×ε,η=0.5×ε and N=M=512.

Figure 5. Numerical solution profiles for Example, (5.2) at T=2.0,δ=0.6×ε,η=0.5×ε and N=M=512.

Figure 6. Numerical solution profiles for Example, 5.3 at T=1.0,δ=0.6×ε,η=0.5×ε and N=M=512.

Figure 6. Numerical solution profiles for Example, 5.3 at T=1.0,δ=0.6×ε,η=0.5×ε and N=M=512.

Figure 7. Log-log plot for the maximum absolute errors before and after the Richardson extrapolation technique.

Figure 7. Log-log plot for the maximum absolute errors before and after the Richardson extrapolation technique.

Data availability statement

No data were used to support the study.