Assessment of Entrustable Professional Activities Among Dutch Endocrine Supervisors

Figures & data

Table 1. Results of EPA levels and entrustment decisions per case-vignette.

	2	3	4	5	Entrusted
Case 1	0 (0%)	5 (56%)	4 (44%)	0 (0%)	4 (44%)
Case 2	0 (0%)	4 (44%)	4 (44%)	1 (11%)	5 (56%)
Case 3	0 (0%)	1 (11%)	6 (67%)	2 (22%)	8 (89%)
Case 4	1 (11%)	8 (89%)	0 (0%)	0 (0)%	0 (0%)
Case 5	0 (0%)	2 (22%)	6 (67%)	1 (11%)	7 (78%)
Case 6	0 (0%)	5 (56%)	4 (44%)	0 (0%)	4 (44%)

Figure 1. Relationship between the average rater confidence level about a trainee and the mean difference in recommended supervision levels between raters.

Table 2. Most important factor for determining EPA level per case.

	capability	integrity	reliability	humility	agency
Case 1	5 (56%)	1 (11%)	2 (22%)	1 (11%)	0 (0%)
Case 2	5 (56%)	0 (0%)	1 (11%)	1 (11%)	2 (22%)
Case 3	6 (67%)	1 (11%)	0 (0%)	1 (11%)	1 (11%)
Case 4	5 (56%)	1 (11%)	1 (11%)	1 (11%)	0 (0%)
Case 5	6 (67%)	1 (11%)	1 (11%)	0 (0%)	1 (11%)
Case 6	6 (67%)	1 (11%)	1 (11%)	0 (0%)	1 (11%)