167
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Assessment of Entrustable Professional Activities Among Dutch Endocrine Supervisors

ORCID Icon, , , , , , , , , , & show all
Article: 2360137 | Received 04 Feb 2024, Accepted 19 May 2024, Published online: 31 May 2024

References

  • Chen HC, ten Cate O. Assessment through entrustable professional activities. In: Delany C, editor. Learning & teaching in clinical contexts: a practical guide. Chatswood: Elsevier Australia; 2018. p. 286–8.
  • Hauer KE, Ten Cate O, Boscardin C, et al. Understanding trust as an essential element of trainee supervision and learning in the workplace. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2014;19(3):435–456. doi: 10.1007/s10459-013-9474-4
  • ten Cate O, Scheele F. Competency-based postgraduate training: can we bridge the gap between theory and clinical practice? Acad Med. 2007;82(6):542–547. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31805559c7
  • Ten Cate O, Hart D, Ankel F, et al. Entrustment decision making in clinical training. Acad Med. 2016;91(2):191–198. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001044
  • Ten Cate O, Carraccio C, Damodaran A, et al. Entrustment decision making: extending Miller’s pyramid. Acad Med. 2021;96(2):199–204. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003800
  • Ten Cate O, Chen HC. The ingredients of a rich entrustment decision. Med Teach. 2020;42(12):1413–1420. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2020.1817348
  • Eltayar AN, Aref SR, Khalifa HM, et al. Do entrustment scales make a difference in the inter-rater reliability of the workplace-based assessment? Med Educ Online. 2022;27(1):2053401. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2022.2053401
  • Weller JM, Castanelli DJ, Chen Y, et al. Making robust assessments of specialist trainees’ workplace performance. Br J Anaesth. 2017;118(2):207–214. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew412
  • Mink RB, Schwartz A, Herman BE, et al. Validity of level of supervision scales for assessing pediatric fellows on the common pediatric subspecialty entrustable professional activities. Acad Med. 2018;93(2):283–291. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001820
  • Kelleher M, Kinnear B, Sall D, et al. A reliability analysis of entrustment-derived workplace-based assessments. Acad Med. 2020;95(4):616–622. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002997
  • Moonen-van Loon JM, Overeem K, Donkers HH, et al. Composite reliability of a workplace-based assessment toolbox for postgraduate medical education. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2013;18(5):1087–1102. doi: 10.1007/s10459-013-9450-z
  • Sterkenburg A, Barach P, Kalkman C, et al. When do supervising physicians decide to entrust residents with unsupervised tasks? Acad Med. 2010;85(9):1408–1417. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181eab0ec
  • ten Cate O. Bias or legitimate subjectivity in entrustment? 2022. Available from: https://icenetblog.royalcollege.ca/2022/05/12/bias-or-legitimate-subjectivity-in-entrustment/
  • van Enk A, Ten Cate O. “Languaging” tacit judgment in formal postgraduate assessment: the documentation of ad hoc and summative entrustment decisions. Perspect Med Educ. 2020;9(6):373–378. doi: 10.1007/S40037-020-00616-X
  • Ten Cate O, Regehr G. The power of subjectivity in the assessment of medical trainees. Acad Med. 2019;94(3):333–337. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002495
  • Hughes RH, Huby M. The construction and interpretation of vignettes in social research. Soc Work & Soc Sci Rev—An Inte J Appl Res. 2004;11(1):36–51. doi: 10.1921/17466105.11.1.36
  • [medicine] NIVDsoi. Landelijk opleidingsplan Interne geneeskunde 2019. 2019.
  • Ten Cate O, Balmer DF, Caretta-Weyer H, et al. Entrustable professional activities and entrustment decision making: a development and research agenda for the next decade. Acad Med. 2021;96(7S):S96–S104. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004106
  • Ten Cate O, Schwartz A, Chen HC. Assessing trainees and making entrustment decisions: on the nature and use of entrustment-supervision scales. Acad Med. 2020;95(11):1662–1669. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003427
  • Ryan MS, Richards A, Perera R, et al. Generalizability of the Ottawa Surgical Competency Operating Room Evaluation (O-SCORE) scale to assess medical student performance on core EPAs in the workplace: findings from one institution. Acad Med. 2021;96(8):1197–1204. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003921
  • Ten Cate O, Jarrett JB. Would I trust or will i trust? The gap between entrustment determinations and entrustment decisions for trainees in pharmacy and other health professions. Pharmacy (Basel). 2023;11(3):107. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy11030107
  • Kogan JR, Holmboe ES, Hauer KE. Tools for direct observation and assessment of clinical skills of medical trainees: a systematic review. JAMA. 2009;302(12):1316–1326. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1365
  • Govaerts MJ, van der Vleuten CP, Schuwirth LW, et al. Broadening perspectives on clinical performance assessment: rethinking the nature of in-training assessment. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2007;12(2):239–260. doi: 10.1007/s10459-006-9043-1
  • Albanese MA. Challenges in using rater judgements in medical education. J Eval Clin Pract. 2000;6(3):305–319. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2753.2000.00253.x
  • Massie J, Ali JM. Workplace-based assessment: a review of user perceptions and strategies to address the identified shortcomings. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2016;21(2):455–473. doi: 10.1007/s10459-015-9614-0
  • Hirsh DA, Holmboe ES, ten Cate O. Time to trust: longitudinal integrated clerkships and entrustable professional activities. Acad Med. 2014;89(2):201–204. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000111
  • Bonnie LHA, Visser MRM, Kramer AWM, et al. Insight in the development of the mutual trust relationship between trainers and trainees in a workplace-based postgraduate medical training programme: a focus group study among trainers and trainees of the Dutch general practice training programme. BMJ Open. 2020;10(4):e036593. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036593
  • Kogan JR, Dine CJ, Conforti LN, et al. Can rater training improve the quality and accuracy of workplace-based assessment narrative comments and entrustment ratings? a randomized controlled trial. Acad Med. 2022;98(2):237–247. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004819
  • Touchie C, Kinnear B, Schumacher D, et al. On the validity of summative entrustment decisions. Med Teach. 2021;43(7):780–787. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2021.1925642
  • Ekpenyong A, Padmore JS, Hauer KE. The purpose, structure, and process of clinical competency committees: guidance for members and program directors. J Grad Med Educ. 2021;13(2 Suppl):45–50. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-20-00841.1
  • Gin BC, Ten Cate O, O’Sullivan PS, et al. Exploring how feedback reflects entrustment decisions using artificial intelligence. Med Educ. 2022;56(3):303–311. doi: 10.1111/medu.14696
  • Mason JD, Ansell J, Warren N, et al. Is motion analysis a valid tool for assessing laparoscopic skill? Surg Endosc. 2013;27(5):1468–1477. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2631-7
  • Sanchez-Margallo JA, Sanchez-Margallo FM, Oropesa I, et al. Objective assessment based on motion-related metrics and technical performance in laparoscopic suturing. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2017;12(2):307–314. doi: 10.1007/s11548-016-1459-3
  • Gingerich A, Sebok-Syer SS, Larstone R, et al. Seeing but not believing: Insights into the intractability of failure to fail. Med Educ. 2020;54(12):1148–1158. doi: 10.1111/medu.14271