Figures & data
Figure 1. Effect of oral administration of L-NAME or subcutaneous isotonic fluid reposition in sham-operated L-NAME-treated (Sh + L-NAME), the cecal ligation and puncture L-NAME-treated (CLP + L-NAME) and CLP 0.15 M NaCl-treated (NaCl) rats on creatinine clearance (CCr), fractional excretion of sodium (FENa), proximal (FEPNa) and post-proximal (FEPPNa) fractional excretion of sodium, fractional excretion of potassium (FEK), and blood pressure compared to sham-operated (Sh) and CLP rats (CLP) untreated rats. The data were calculated as the area under curve vs. time (AUC, Δ% min−1) and reported as the means ± SEM. *p ≤ 0.05 vs. GI group (ANOVA and Bonferroni's contrast test).
![Figure 1. Effect of oral administration of L-NAME or subcutaneous isotonic fluid reposition in sham-operated L-NAME-treated (Sh + L-NAME), the cecal ligation and puncture L-NAME-treated (CLP + L-NAME) and CLP 0.15 M NaCl-treated (NaCl) rats on creatinine clearance (CCr), fractional excretion of sodium (FENa), proximal (FEPNa) and post-proximal (FEPPNa) fractional excretion of sodium, fractional excretion of potassium (FEK), and blood pressure compared to sham-operated (Sh) and CLP rats (CLP) untreated rats. The data were calculated as the area under curve vs. time (AUC, Δ% min−1) and reported as the means ± SEM. *p ≤ 0.05 vs. GI group (ANOVA and Bonferroni's contrast test).](/cms/asset/b53af1a3-cfd4-4842-9dd1-db183035b94d/irnf_a_11379197_uf0001_b.gif)
Table 1. Effect of oral administration of L-NAME or subcutaneous isotonic fluid reposition in sham-operated L-NAME-treated (GII), the cecal ligation and puncture (CLP) L-NAME-treated (GIV), and CLP 0.15 M NaCl-treated (GV) rats on body weight, serum pH, PaCO2, , sodium, potassium, and lithium levels compared to sham-operated (GI) and CLP rats (GIII) untreated rats. The data are reported as the means ± SEM for 10 rats per group