Figures & data
Figure 1. The variation of proteolytic activity of trout during microwave cooking at different powers (⋄ 20%a, ▪ 40%a, ▴ 60%b). Solid lines represent the model. Powers with different letters are significantly different (p ≤ 0.05).
![Figure 1. The variation of proteolytic activity of trout during microwave cooking at different powers (⋄ 20%a, ▪ 40%a, ▴ 60%b). Solid lines represent the model. Powers with different letters are significantly different (p ≤ 0.05).](/cms/asset/453110bc-b01f-4fcc-b127-e6eb00bb3697/ljfp_a_10344783_o_f0001.gif)
Figure 2. The variation of texture of trout during microwave cooking at different powers (⋄ 20%b, ▪ 40%a,▴ 60%a). Solid lines represent the model. Powers with different letters are significantly different (p ≤ 0.05).
![Figure 2. The variation of texture of trout during microwave cooking at different powers (⋄ 20%b, ▪ 40%a,▴ 60%a). Solid lines represent the model. Powers with different letters are significantly different (p ≤ 0.05).](/cms/asset/f32c77f7-1a4d-4b36-b562-dd89aa8a3406/ljfp_a_10344783_o_f0002.gif)