5,088
Views
28
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research Papers

A child feeding index is superior to WHO IYCF indicators in explaining length-for-age Z-scores of young children in rural Cambodia

, , , , , & show all
Pages 124-134 | Received 17 Apr 2014, Accepted 27 Aug 2014, Published online: 16 Sep 2014

Figures & data

Table 1. Current infant and young child feeding recommendations in CambodiaCitation23

Table 2. Scoring system for child feeding index by age group

Table 3. Selected household characteristics, WHO IYCF indicators and child nutritional status

Table 4. Child feeding index (CFI) components by CFI age-group

Figure 1. Mean (SD) LAZ per 2-months age-group (n  =  798). (The error bars show −1 SD of the mean).

Figure 1. Mean (SD) LAZ per 2-months age-group (n  =  798). (The error bars show −1 SD of the mean).

Table 5. Associations of WHO IYFC indicators and LAZ - results from independent sample t-test

Table 6. Bivariate correlations between CFI components and LAZ by age group

Figure 2. Estimated marginal means of LAZ scores by CFI scores. No. of cases: CFI 1  =  1, CFI 2  =  7, CFI 3  =  25, CFI 4  =  35, CFI 5  =  105, CFI 6  =  201, CFI 7  =  189, CFI 8  =  106, CFI 9  =  83, CFI 10  =  45.

* Covariates appearing in the model are evaluated at the following values: CFI, CFIsq, age (days), household members aged <2 years, education respondent (years of schooling), household’s wealth index, age of mother, height (cm) of mother, BMI of mother, sex of child; ** CFI score 1 represents one case only, thus the estimation might be biased. (See in supplementary material for the exact value of the estimated marginal means, standard error and 95% confidence intervals, www.maneyonline.com/doi/suppl/10.1179/2046905514Y.0000000155.)

Figure 2. Estimated marginal means of LAZ scores by CFI scores. No. of cases: CFI 1  =  1, CFI 2  =  7, CFI 3  =  25, CFI 4  =  35, CFI 5  =  105, CFI 6  =  201, CFI 7  =  189, CFI 8  =  106, CFI 9  =  83, CFI 10  =  45.* Covariates appearing in the model are evaluated at the following values: CFI, CFIsq, age (days), household members aged <2 years, education respondent (years of schooling), household’s wealth index, age of mother, height (cm) of mother, BMI of mother, sex of child; ** CFI score 1 represents one case only, thus the estimation might be biased. (See Table 1 in supplementary material for the exact value of the estimated marginal means, standard error and 95% confidence intervals, www.maneyonline.com/doi/suppl/10.1179/2046905514Y.0000000155.)

Table 7. Linear model of predictors of LAZ disaggregated into CFI1–4 and CFI5–10

Supplemental material

ypch_a_11747155_sm0001.doc

Download MS Word (39.5 KB)