Figures & data
FIGURE 3. Diameter (cm), depth (cm), and sediment mass (g/cm2) (mean ± standard error) of cryoconite holes of Commonwealth (Common), Canada, Howard, Hughes, and Taylor glaciers. Different letters indicate significant differences at P ≤ 0.05. Capital letters relate to differences in diameter, lowercase letters to differences in depth, and italic letters to differences in sediment mass
![FIGURE 3. Diameter (cm), depth (cm), and sediment mass (g/cm2) (mean ± standard error) of cryoconite holes of Commonwealth (Common), Canada, Howard, Hughes, and Taylor glaciers. Different letters indicate significant differences at P ≤ 0.05. Capital letters relate to differences in diameter, lowercase letters to differences in depth, and italic letters to differences in sediment mass](/cms/asset/daf93398-deb4-47ff-85e2-8cd4b1d8a742/uaar_a_11956973_f0003.gif)
FIGURE 4. Abundance of invertebrates (# 100 g−1 dry sediment) (mean ± standard error) in cryoconite holes of Commonwealth (N = 24), Canada (N = 24), Howard (N = 24), Hughes (N = 24), and Taylor (N = 38) glaciers. Black bars indicate tardigrades and checked bars rotifers. Capital letters indicate significant differences at P ≤ 0.05 among glaciers for rotifers, and lowercase letters indicate significant differences at P ≤ 0.05 among glaciers for tardigrades
![FIGURE 4. Abundance of invertebrates (# 100 g−1 dry sediment) (mean ± standard error) in cryoconite holes of Commonwealth (N = 24), Canada (N = 24), Howard (N = 24), Hughes (N = 24), and Taylor (N = 38) glaciers. Black bars indicate tardigrades and checked bars rotifers. Capital letters indicate significant differences at P ≤ 0.05 among glaciers for rotifers, and lowercase letters indicate significant differences at P ≤ 0.05 among glaciers for tardigrades](/cms/asset/7780a7e0-6caa-4bf8-96cc-1b8e586ba54f/uaar_a_11956973_f0004.gif)
FIGURE 5. Concentrations of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) (mean ± standard error) in cryoconite holes of Commonwealth (N = 24), Canada (N = 24), Howard (N = 24), Hughes (N = 24), and Taylor (N = 38) glaciers. Letters indicate significant differences at P ≤ 0.05
![FIGURE 5. Concentrations of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) (mean ± standard error) in cryoconite holes of Commonwealth (N = 24), Canada (N = 24), Howard (N = 24), Hughes (N = 24), and Taylor (N = 38) glaciers. Letters indicate significant differences at P ≤ 0.05](/cms/asset/793807f1-dca9-41bd-8bfc-bb8f43b96a87/uaar_a_11956973_f0005.gif)
FIGURE 6. Concentrations of ammonium (NH4 +) and nitrate (NO3 –) (mean ± standard error) in cryoconite holes of Commonwealth (N = 24), Canada (N = 24), Howard (N = 24), Hughes (N = 24), and Taylor (N = 38) glaciers. Dashed lines show ammonium levels and continuous lines show nitrate levels. Capital letters indicate significant differences at P ≤ 0.05 among glaciers for nitrate, and lowercase letters indicate significant differences at P ≤ 0.05 among glaciers for ammonium
![FIGURE 6. Concentrations of ammonium (NH4 +) and nitrate (NO3 –) (mean ± standard error) in cryoconite holes of Commonwealth (N = 24), Canada (N = 24), Howard (N = 24), Hughes (N = 24), and Taylor (N = 38) glaciers. Dashed lines show ammonium levels and continuous lines show nitrate levels. Capital letters indicate significant differences at P ≤ 0.05 among glaciers for nitrate, and lowercase letters indicate significant differences at P ≤ 0.05 among glaciers for ammonium](/cms/asset/a195afb7-f78a-4bf1-9f23-d19f31128e7d/uaar_a_11956973_f0006.gif)
FIGURE 7. Concentrations of (a) cations: sodium (Na+, continuous line), calcium (Ca+2, dashed with triangles line), potassium (K+, dashed with squares line), and magnesium (Mg+2, dashed with crisscross line) and (b) anions: chloride (Cl–, continuous line) and sulfate (SO4 –2, dashed line) (mean ± standard error) in cryoconite holes of Commonwealth (N = 24), Canada (N = 24), Howard (N = 24), Hughes (N = 24), and Taylor (N = 38) glaciers. Capital letters indicate significant differences at P ≤ 0.05 among glaciers for Na+ and SO4 –2, italic capital letters indicate significant differences at P ≤ 0.05 among glaciers for Ca, lowercase letters indicate significant differences at P ≤ 0.05 among glaciers for K, and Cl, and italic lowercase letters indicate significant differences at P ≤ 0.05 among glaciers for Mg
![FIGURE 7. Concentrations of (a) cations: sodium (Na+, continuous line), calcium (Ca+2, dashed with triangles line), potassium (K+, dashed with squares line), and magnesium (Mg+2, dashed with crisscross line) and (b) anions: chloride (Cl–, continuous line) and sulfate (SO4 –2, dashed line) (mean ± standard error) in cryoconite holes of Commonwealth (N = 24), Canada (N = 24), Howard (N = 24), Hughes (N = 24), and Taylor (N = 38) glaciers. Capital letters indicate significant differences at P ≤ 0.05 among glaciers for Na+ and SO4 –2, italic capital letters indicate significant differences at P ≤ 0.05 among glaciers for Ca, lowercase letters indicate significant differences at P ≤ 0.05 among glaciers for K, and Cl, and italic lowercase letters indicate significant differences at P ≤ 0.05 among glaciers for Mg](/cms/asset/4933c81c-e041-45e6-8330-ba5fb9408687/uaar_a_11956973_f0007.gif)
FIGURE 8. Acidity (pH, dashed line) and salinity (EC, continuous line) (mean ± standard error) in cryoconite holes of Commonwealth (N = 24), Canada (N = 24), Howard (N = 24), Hughes (N = 24), and Taylor (N = 38) glaciers. Capital letters indicate significant differences at P ≤ 0.05 among glaciers for salinity, and lowercase letters indicate significant differences at P ≤ 0.05 among glaciers for pH
![FIGURE 8. Acidity (pH, dashed line) and salinity (EC, continuous line) (mean ± standard error) in cryoconite holes of Commonwealth (N = 24), Canada (N = 24), Howard (N = 24), Hughes (N = 24), and Taylor (N = 38) glaciers. Capital letters indicate significant differences at P ≤ 0.05 among glaciers for salinity, and lowercase letters indicate significant differences at P ≤ 0.05 among glaciers for pH](/cms/asset/5f42cd73-8478-473c-a6c2-16b102d982a0/uaar_a_11956973_f0008.gif)
Table 1 Taxonomic biotic composition of cryoconite holes on glaciers in Taylor Valley, Antarctica
Table 2 Relationship between invertebrate abundance and properties of cryoconite holes as the best-fitted multiple regression model
Table 3 Morphological and invertebrate differences between sampling seasons, elevations, and sides on Canada Glacier. Data represent averages