University Admission Test Associates with Academic Performance at the End of Medical Course in a PBL Medical Hybrid Curriculum

Figures & data

Table 1 Bivariate Correlation Between UAT and PT, UAT and OSCE, and UAT and FMC

	r (Pearson)	R square	p-value
UAT x PT	0.1057	0.0112	0.4747
UAT x OSCE	−0.2017	0.0407	0.1691
UAT x FMC	0.3421	0.117	0.0173

Abbreviations: UAT, university admission test; PT, progress testing; OSCE, Organized Structured Clinical Examination; FMC, average final mean marks in the clerkship.

Figure 1 Projection of the multiple linear regression among UAT, FMC, and PT marks.

Abbreviations: UAT, university admission test; FMC, average final marks in the clerkship; PT, progress testing.

Figure 2 Projection of the multiple linear regression among UAT, OSCE and FMC marks.

Abbreviations: UAT, university admission test; FMC, average final marks in the clerkship; OSCE, Organized Structured Clinical Examination.

Figure 3 Projection of the multiple linear regression among UAT, OSCE, and PT marks.

Abbreviations: UAT, university admission test; OSCE, Organized Structured Clinical Examination; PT, progress testing.

Table 2 Results from ANOVA Test for Multiple Linear Regression, Showing the Relationship Between Marks in the UAT and the Independent Variables PT, OSCE and FMC

	Multiple R	R Square	Adjusted R Square	Coefficients (βi)	p-value
Coef. multiple correlation (Ryy)	0.464	0.2158	0.1623	–	0.012
Intercept (a) =	–	–	–	99.76	<0.001
Coef. regression (b1) =PT	–	–	–	−0.88	0.193
Coef. regression (b2) =OSCE	–	–	–	−3.52	0.035
Coef. regression (b3) =FMC	–	–	–	9.81	0.003

Abbreviations: PT, progress testing; OSCE, Organized Structured Clinical Examination; FMC, average final marks in the clerkship; UAT, university admissions test.