78
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

The effect of e-learning on the quality of orthodontic appliances

, , &
Pages 545-552 | Published online: 27 Aug 2015

Figures & data

Figure 1 Flow diagram of the assessment for eligibility.

Figure 1 Flow diagram of the assessment for eligibility.

Figure 2 Appliances that students were required to make during the course. (A) Schwarz Plate (B) Karwetzky’s U- Bow Activator Type 1 (C) Fränkel’s Functional Regulator Type 3.

Figure 2 Appliances that students were required to make during the course. (A) Schwarz Plate (B) Karwetzky’s U- Bow Activator Type 1 (C) Fränkel’s Functional Regulator Type 3.

Table 1 Film processing

Table 2 Grading system Schwarz Plate

Table 3 Grading system Karwetzky’s U-Bow Activator Type 1

Table 4 Grading System Fränkel’s Functional Regulator Type 3

Table 5 Representation of group distribution

Figure 3 Result-specific differences in the Schwarz Plate on a 15- point scale.

Figure 3 Result-specific differences in the Schwarz Plate on a 15- point scale.

Figure 4 Result-specific differences in Karwetzky’s U-bow on a 15- point scale.

Figure 4 Result-specific differences in Karwetzky’s U-bow on a 15- point scale.

Figure 5 Result- specific differences in Fränkel’s functional regulator Type 3 on al 15- Point scale.

Figure 5 Result- specific differences in Fränkel’s functional regulator Type 3 on al 15- Point scale.

Table 6 Mean outcome scores and standard deviations concerning groups and appliances

Figure 6 Device-specific differences on a 15- point scale.

Note: **=P>0.01.
Abbreviations: SP, Schwarz Plate; UBA, Karwetzky’s U-Bow Activator; FR, Fränkel’s Functional Regulator Type 3.
Figure 6 Device-specific differences on a 15- point scale.

Table 7 Comparisons of reliability measurement between the American Board of Orthodontics Objective Grading System and a 15-point scale system