154
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Economic Evaluation of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan in Previously Treated HER2-Low Advanced Breast Cancer in the United States

ORCID Icon, &
Pages 453-463 | Received 13 Sep 2022, Accepted 29 Nov 2022, Published online: 04 Dec 2023

Figures & data

Figure 1 The decision tree and partitioned survival model structure overview for HER2-low breast cancer patients. Group 1 represents overall patients, which includes HR-positive and HR-negative patients. Group 2 represents the HR-positive patients. The intervention and comparator of each group is T-DXd and chemotherapy, respectively. The PartSA containes three health states: progression-free, progressed disease and death.

Abbreviations: PartSA, partitioned survival approach; HR+, hormone receptor–positive; T-DXd, trastuzumab deruxtecan.
Figure 1 The decision tree and partitioned survival model structure overview for HER2-low breast cancer patients. Group 1 represents overall patients, which includes HR-positive and HR-negative patients. Group 2 represents the HR-positive patients. The intervention and comparator of each group is T-DXd and chemotherapy, respectively. The PartSA containes three health states: progression-free, progressed disease and death.

Table 1 Key Clinical Data

Table 2 Model Costs, Utility Estimates and Other Parameters

Figure 2 Reconstructed Kaplan-Meier survival curve and the projected survival curve in different groups. (A) Output of PFS curve for all patients group; (B) Output of OS curve for all patients group; (C) Output of PFS curve for the HR+ patients group; (D) Output of OS curve for the HR+ patients group. Each cycle of the x-axis is three weeks.

Abbreviations: KM, Kaplan-Meier; PFS, progression-free survival; OS, overall survival; HR+, hormone-receptor positive; T-DXd, trastuzumab deruxtecan.
Figure 2 Reconstructed Kaplan-Meier survival curve and the projected survival curve in different groups. (A) Output of PFS curve for all patients group; (B) Output of OS curve for all patients group; (C) Output of PFS curve for the HR+ patients group; (D) Output of OS curve for the HR+ patients group. Each cycle of the x-axis is three weeks.

Table 3 Results of the Base-Case Analysis

Figure 3 Tornado diagram of the one-way sensitivity analysis results. (A) The output of all patients group. (B) The output of HR-positive subgroup.

Abbreviations: T-DXd, trastuzumab deruxtecan; BSA, body surface area; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival; PD, progressed disease; ICUR, incremental cost-utility ratio; QALY, quality-adjusted life-year; WTP, willingness to pay; HR, hazard ratio; HR+, hormone-receptor positive;
Figure 3 Tornado diagram of the one-way sensitivity analysis results. (A) The output of all patients group. (B) The output of HR-positive subgroup.

Figure 4 The output of probabilistic sensitivity analysis. (A) The output of all patients group. (B) The output of HR-positive subgroup.

Notes: In the cost-effectiveness acceptable curve, the y-axis indicates the likelihood that a regimen is cost-effective across the willingness-to-pay threshold (x-axis). The red dashed line represents the WTP threshold; In the incremental cost-effectiveness scatter plot, each dot represents one output. The red circle is the 95% confidence ellipse. The black dashed line represents the WTP threshold.
Abbreviations: T-DXd, trastuzumab deruxtecan; QALY, quality-adjusted life-year; WTP, willingness to pay; HR+, hormone-receptor positive.
Figure 4 The output of probabilistic sensitivity analysis. (A) The output of all patients group. (B) The output of HR-positive subgroup.