102
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Impact of mild exacerbation on COPD symptoms in a Japanese cohort

, , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 1269-1278 | Published online: 09 Jun 2016

Figures & data

Table 1 Characteristics of study population

Figure 1 Frequency of exacerbation with different severities over 2 years.

Notes: Patients with no (□), mild ([
]), and moderate or severe (■) exacerbations. Bars on left: proportions of patients without, and with mild, and moderate or severe exacerbations during the first year of follow-up. Bars on right: respective incidence of exacerbations in these groups during the second year of follow-up.
Figure 1 Frequency of exacerbation with different severities over 2 years.

Table 2 Comparison of baseline characteristics among patients stratified according to severity of exacerbation

Table 3 Comparison of baseline comorbidities among patients stratified according to severity of exacerbation

Figure 2 Annual changes in FEV1 in three groups of patients over 2 years of follow-up.

Notes: Patients in the exacerbation-free (••▲••), mild exacerbator (–○–), and moderate/severe exacerbator (–■–) groups. Moderate/severe exacerbator vs exacerbation free, P<0.001; mild exacerbator vs exacerbation free, P=1.000; and mild exacerbator vs moderate/severe exacerbator, P=0.001.
Abbreviation: FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 second.
Figure 2 Annual changes in FEV1 in three groups of patients over 2 years of follow-up.

Figure 3 Annual changes in LAA% in three groups of patients over 2 years of follow-up.

Notes: Patients in the exacerbation-free (••▲••), mild exacerbator (–○–), and moderate/severe exacerbator (–■–) groups. Moderate/severe exacerbator vs exacerbation free, P=0.228; mild exacerbator vs exacerbation free, P=1.000; and mild exacerbator vs moderate/severe exacerbator, P=0.100.
Abbreviation: LAA%, ratio of low attenuation area.
Figure 3 Annual changes in LAA% in three groups of patients over 2 years of follow-up.

Table 4 Predictors of CAT (minimal clinical important difference; ΔCAT ≥2 per year) increase determined by multivariate logistic regression analysis

Figure 4 Annual changes in CAT scores in three groups of patients over 2 years of follow-up.

Notes: Patients in the exacerbation-free (••▲••), mild exacerbator (–○–), and moderate/severe exacerbator (–■–) groups. Moderate/severe exacerbator vs exacerbation free, P<0.001; mild exacerbator vs exacerbation free, P=0.014; and mild exacerbator vs moderate/severe exacerbator, P=0.493.
Abbreviation: CAT, COPD assessment test.
Figure 4 Annual changes in CAT scores in three groups of patients over 2 years of follow-up.

Figure 5 Annual changes in SGRQ total scores over 2 years of follow-up.

Notes: Patients in the exacerbation-free (••▲••), mild exacerbator (–○–), and moderate/severe exacerbator (–■–) groups. Moderate/severe exacerbator vs exacerbation free, P<0.001; mild exacerbator vs exacerbation free, P=0.041; and mild exacerbator vs moderate/severe exacerbator, P=0.013.

Abbreviation: SGRQ, St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire.

Figure 5 Annual changes in SGRQ total scores over 2 years of follow-up.Notes: Patients in the exacerbation-free (••▲••), mild exacerbator (–○–), and moderate/severe exacerbator (–■–) groups. Moderate/severe exacerbator vs exacerbation free, P<0.001; mild exacerbator vs exacerbation free, P=0.041; and mild exacerbator vs moderate/severe exacerbator, P=0.013.Abbreviation: SGRQ, St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire.

Figure 6 Annual changes in SGRQ symptoms category over 2 years of follow-up.

Notes: Patients in the exacerbation-free (••▲••), mild exacerbator (–○–), and moderate/severe exacerbator (–■–) groups. Moderate/severe exacerbator vs exacerbation free, P<0.001; mild exacerbator vs exacerbation free, P=0.002; and mild exacerbator vs moderate/severe exacerbator, P=1.000.

Abbreviation: SGRQ, St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire.

Figure 6 Annual changes in SGRQ symptoms category over 2 years of follow-up.Notes: Patients in the exacerbation-free (••▲••), mild exacerbator (–○–), and moderate/severe exacerbator (–■–) groups. Moderate/severe exacerbator vs exacerbation free, P<0.001; mild exacerbator vs exacerbation free, P=0.002; and mild exacerbator vs moderate/severe exacerbator, P=1.000.Abbreviation: SGRQ, St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire.

Figure 7 Annual changes in SGRQ activity category over 2 years of follow-up.

Notes: Patients in the exacerbation-free (••▲••), mild exacerbator (–○–), and moderate/severe exacerbator (–■–) groups. Moderate/severe exacerbator vs exacerbation free, P<0.001; mild exacerbator vs exacerbation free, P=0.226; and mild exacerbator vs moderate/severe exacerbator, P=0.004.

Abbreviation: SGRQ, St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire.

Figure 7 Annual changes in SGRQ activity category over 2 years of follow-up.Notes: Patients in the exacerbation-free (••▲••), mild exacerbator (–○–), and moderate/severe exacerbator (–■–) groups. Moderate/severe exacerbator vs exacerbation free, P<0.001; mild exacerbator vs exacerbation free, P=0.226; and mild exacerbator vs moderate/severe exacerbator, P=0.004.Abbreviation: SGRQ, St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire.

Figure 8 Annual changes in SGRQ impact category over 2 years of follow-up.

Notes: Patients in the exacerbation-free (••▲••), mild exacerbator (–○–), and moderate/severe exacerbator (–■–) groups. Moderate/severe exacerbator vs exacerbation free, P<0.001; mild exacerbator vs exacerbation free, P=0.064; and mild exacerbator vs moderate/severe exacerbator, P=0.008.
Abbreviation: SGRQ, St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire.
Figure 8 Annual changes in SGRQ impact category over 2 years of follow-up.