523
Views
57
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Is the 1-minute sit-to-stand test a good tool for the evaluation of the impact of pulmonary rehabilitation? Determination of the minimal important difference in COPD

, , , , , & show all
Pages 2609-2616 | Published online: 19 Oct 2016

Figures & data

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the patients

Table 2 Main determinants of 1-minute STS repetitions at baseline (multivariate analysis)

Table 3 Change of the parameters measured during 1-minute STS test at baseline and at the end of PR

Table 4 Comparisons between 1-minute STS repetitions, 6MWD and QMVC at baseline and the end of the PR

Figure 1 Association between change in 1-minute STS test and change in (A) 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) and (B) quadriceps maximal voluntary contraction (QMVC) with pulmonary rehabilitation.

Note: (A and B) The black dotted line is the linear regression of the relation between the two variables.
Abbreviations: 6MWD, 6-minute walk distance; QMVC, quadriceps maximal voluntary contraction; STS, sit-to-stand.
Figure 1 Association between change in 1-minute STS test and change in (A) 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) and (B) quadriceps maximal voluntary contraction (QMVC) with pulmonary rehabilitation.

Figure 2 Receiver operating characteristic curve for the identification of the minimal important difference of the 1-minute STS test using a 30 m improvement in 6-minute walk test as anchor.

Abbreviations: STS, sit-to-stand; AUC, area under curve.
Figure 2 Receiver operating characteristic curve for the identification of the minimal important difference of the 1-minute STS test using a 30 m improvement in 6-minute walk test as anchor.