63
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

The impact of indacaterol/glycopyrronium fixed-dose combination versus tiotropium monotherapy on lung function and treatment preference: a randomized crossover study – the FAVOR study

&
Pages 69-77 | Published online: 22 Dec 2017

Figures & data

Figure 1 Study design.

Notes: During screening, patients received their current COPD treatment and were instructed to abstain from tiotropium inhalation on visit 3 (randomization). Inhaled corticosteroids were allowed to be taken throughout the study when started 30 days prior to screening visit.
Abbreviations: IND/GLY, indacaterol/glycopyrronium; o.d., once daily; V, visit.
Figure 1 Study design.

Figure 2 Patient disposition (full analysis set).

Notes: aForty-three patients were randomized into the sequence 1 (IND/GLY – tiotropium) and 45 patients were randomized into sequence 2 (tiotropium – IND/GLY). Three patients randomized to the IND/GLY – tiotropium group were treated vice-versa (ie, tiotropium – IND/GLY). bOne patient discontinued due to adverse event in tiotropium – IND/GLY group after start of treatment period 2.
Abbreviation: IND/GLY, indacaterol/glycopyrronium.
Figure 2 Patient disposition (full analysis set).

Table 1 Demographic and baseline characteristics (full analysis set)

Figure 3 FEV1 (L) 1 h post-inhalation after 4 weeks of each treatment (full analysis set).

Note: Data are least square means ±95% CI.
Abbreviations: FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 s; IND/GLY, indacaterol/glycopyrronium.
Figure 3 FEV1 (L) 1 h post-inhalation after 4 weeks of each treatment (full analysis set).

Table 2 Treatment preference after receiving both the treatments (full analysis set)

Figure 4 Very important/important subjective reasons cited by patients and physicians for a preference for IND/GLY or tiotropium (full analysis set).

Notes: Data are displayed as percentage of patients/physicians that rated the provided reasons from a 5-item scale (very important, important, neutral, unimportant, and very unimportant) as very important or important. Two patients and 1 physician did not answer the questionnaire.
Abbreviation: IND/GLY, indacaterol/glycopyrronium.
Figure 4 Very important/important subjective reasons cited by patients and physicians for a preference for IND/GLY or tiotropium (full analysis set).

Figure 5 Patients very satisfied/satisfied with their treatment (full analysis set).

Notes: Data are displayed as percentage of patients that were very satisfied or satisfied with the medication in terms of the provided items. All patients answered the questionnaire with exception of 1 patient who discontinued the study.
Abbreviation: IND/GLY, indacaterol/glycopyrronium.
Figure 5 Patients very satisfied/satisfied with their treatment (full analysis set).

Figure 6 TSQM-9 questionnaire results by domain (full analysis set).

Notes: Data are least square mean (±95% CI) of TSQM-9 total scores by domain (effectiveness, convenience, and global satisfaction) determined after 4 weeks of treatment. *p=0.0001, **p=0.0035. All patients answered the questionnaire with exception of 1 patient who discontinued the study.
Abbreviations: IND/GLY, indacaterol/glycopyrronium; TSQM-9, Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication.
Figure 6 TSQM-9 questionnaire results by domain (full analysis set).

Figure 7 Improvement in FEV1 (L) 1 h post-inhalation based on medication preference (full analysis set).

Note: Data are in least square mean ±95% CI.
Abbreviations: FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 s; IND/GLY, indacaterol/glycopyrronium.
Figure 7 Improvement in FEV1 (L) 1 h post-inhalation based on medication preference (full analysis set).

Table 3 Incidences of TEAEs reported by ≥2.5% of patients in either group (safety analysis set)