72
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL RESEARCH

The Index sAGP is Valuable for Distinguishing Atypical Hepatocellular Carcinoma from Atypical Benign Focal Hepatic Lesions

ORCID Icon, , , , , ORCID Icon, , , ORCID Icon & show all
Pages 317-325 | Received 04 Dec 2023, Accepted 23 Jan 2024, Published online: 08 Feb 2024

Figures & data

Figure 1 Flowchart of patient selection.

Abbreviations: FHL, focal hepatic lesion; AFP, alpha-fetoprotein; aHCC, atypical hepatocellular carcinoma; aBFHL, atypical benign focal hepatic lesion.
Figure 1 Flowchart of patient selection.

Table 1 Demographic and Clinical Characteristics of the Patients

Table 2 Reported Derived Indexes for the Diagnosis of Atypical Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Figure 2 Receiver operating characteristic curves of derived indexes reported previously for the diagnosis of atypical hepatocellular carcinoma. (A) Inflammation-related derived indexes; (B) Liver function-related derived indexes.

Abbreviations: NLR, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; PLR, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio; LMR, lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio; SII, systemic immune inflammatory index; ALT, alanine aminotransaminase; AST, aspartate aminotransaminase; GGT, γ-glutamyltransferase; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; GPR, γ-glutamyltransferase-to-platelet ratio; FPR, fibrinogen-to-prealbumin ratio; FAR, fibrinogen-to-albumin ratio.
Figure 2 Receiver operating characteristic curves of derived indexes reported previously for the diagnosis of atypical hepatocellular carcinoma. (A) Inflammation-related derived indexes; (B) Liver function-related derived indexes.

Figure 3 Diagnostic performance of sAGP, AGP, GPR, and AFP in differentiating atypical hepatocellular carcinoma from atypical benign focal hepatic lesion. (A) Receiver operating characteristic curves; (B) Diagnostic validity metrics.

Abbreviations: AUROC, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; CI, confidence interval; sAGP, (standardized α-fetoprotein + standardized γ-glutamyltransferase) to standardized platelet count ratio; AGP, (α-fetoprotein + γ-glutamyltransferase) to platelet count ratio; GPR, γ-glutamyltransferase-to-platelet ratio; AFP, α-fetoprotein; SEN, sensitivity; SPE, specificity; ACC, accuracy; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value; PLR, positive likelihood ratio; NLR, negative likelihood ratio.
Figure 3 Diagnostic performance of sAGP, AGP, GPR, and AFP in differentiating atypical hepatocellular carcinoma from atypical benign focal hepatic lesion. (A) Receiver operating characteristic curves; (B) Diagnostic validity metrics.

Figure 4 Receiver operating characteristic curves and diagnostic validity metrics of sAGP in the diagnosis of aHCC subgroups. (A) Early BCLC stage (0/A) aHCC vs aBFHL; (B) Early TNM stage (I) aHCC vs aBFHL; (C) Small aHCC (tumor diameter < 3 cm) vs aBFHL; (D) AFP-negative aHCC (AFP < 20 ng/mL) vs aBFHL.

Abbreviations: AUROC, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; CI, confidence interval; sAGP, (standardized α-fetoprotein + standardized γ-glutamyltransferase) to standardized platelet count ratio; GPR, γ-glutamyltransferase-to-platelet ratio; AFP, α-fetoprotein; SEN, sensitivity; SPE, specificity; ACC, accuracy; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value; PLR, positive likelihood ratio; NLR, negative likelihood ratio.
Figure 4 Receiver operating characteristic curves and diagnostic validity metrics of sAGP in the diagnosis of aHCC subgroups. (A) Early BCLC stage (0/A) aHCC vs aBFHL; (B) Early TNM stage (I) aHCC vs aBFHL; (C) Small aHCC (tumor diameter < 3 cm) vs aBFHL; (D) AFP-negative aHCC (AFP < 20 ng/mL) vs aBFHL.