Figures & data
Figure 1 Effect of ICT on ENU-induced leukemia in (A) Body weight; (B) Spleen and liver index; (C) Photographs of the spleen; (D) Images of peripheral blood smears of the experimental group. The red arrow indicates leukemic blast cells. Data are mean ± SD (n = 6). Scale bar= 50 µm, Magnification= 400 ×, *P < 0.01 vs normal control, #P < 0.01 vs Leukemic group.
![Figure 1 Effect of ICT on ENU-induced leukemia in (A) Body weight; (B) Spleen and liver index; (C) Photographs of the spleen; (D) Images of peripheral blood smears of the experimental group. The red arrow indicates leukemic blast cells. Data are mean ± SD (n = 6). Scale bar= 50 µm, Magnification= 400 ×, *P < 0.01 vs normal control, #P < 0.01 vs Leukemic group.](/cms/asset/5dfbda7c-9db5-4669-a042-e4a7c165ae89/djir_a_12300318_f0001_c.jpg)
Figure 2 Effect of ICT on haematological parameters in ENU-induced leukemic mice (A) RBC; (B) WBC; (C) Hb; (D) Platelet count. “Data are mean ± SD (n = 6). *P < 0.01 vs normal control, #P < 0.01 vs Leukemic group.
![Figure 2 Effect of ICT on haematological parameters in ENU-induced leukemic mice (A) RBC; (B) WBC; (C) Hb; (D) Platelet count. “Data are mean ± SD (n = 6). *P < 0.01 vs normal control, #P < 0.01 vs Leukemic group.](/cms/asset/c6603d5f-f807-4ed2-898b-eb5144cd81c4/djir_a_12300318_f0002_c.jpg)
Figure 3 Effect of ICT on histopathological changes in ENU-induced leukemic mice. Representative H&E-stained (A) Spleen and (B) liver tissue section images. Scale bar= 50 µm, Magnification= 400 ×.
![Figure 3 Effect of ICT on histopathological changes in ENU-induced leukemic mice. Representative H&E-stained (A) Spleen and (B) liver tissue section images. Scale bar= 50 µm, Magnification= 400 ×.](/cms/asset/f9a86d26-ce3d-4a59-a42c-773b699bf972/djir_a_12300318_f0003_c.jpg)
Figure 4 Effect of ICT on inflammatory markers in ENU-induced leukemic mice (A) NF-κB p65; (B) TNF-α; (C) IL-1β; (D) IFN-γ in spleen and liver. Data are mean ± SD (n = 6). *P < 0.01 vs normal control, #P < 0.01 vs Leukemic group.
![Figure 4 Effect of ICT on inflammatory markers in ENU-induced leukemic mice (A) NF-κB p65; (B) TNF-α; (C) IL-1β; (D) IFN-γ in spleen and liver. Data are mean ± SD (n = 6). *P < 0.01 vs normal control, #P < 0.01 vs Leukemic group.](/cms/asset/24b26f46-c553-454a-8b28-67772998faa9/djir_a_12300318_f0004_c.jpg)
Figure 5 Immunohistochemistry results show protein distribution of NF-κB p65 in the (A) spleen and (B) liver of ENU-induced leukemic mice. Scale bar= 50 µm, Magnification= 400 ×.
![Figure 5 Immunohistochemistry results show protein distribution of NF-κB p65 in the (A) spleen and (B) liver of ENU-induced leukemic mice. Scale bar= 50 µm, Magnification= 400 ×.](/cms/asset/e6b58ab0-8e1f-4f3d-ac47-a946a20424a9/djir_a_12300318_f0005_c.jpg)
Figure 6 Effect of ICT on IL-6/JAK2/STAT3 in ENU-induced leukemic mice (A) IL-6; (B) JAK-2; (C) STAT 3 in spleen and liver. Data are mean ± SD (n = 6). *P < 0.01 vs normal control, #P < 0.01 vs Leukemic group.
![Figure 6 Effect of ICT on IL-6/JAK2/STAT3 in ENU-induced leukemic mice (A) IL-6; (B) JAK-2; (C) STAT 3 in spleen and liver. Data are mean ± SD (n = 6). *P < 0.01 vs normal control, #P < 0.01 vs Leukemic group.](/cms/asset/0c349002-9a72-4b9d-867c-375738b1121d/djir_a_12300318_f0006_c.jpg)
Figure 7 Immunofluorescence analysis of proteins in the JAK-STAT pathway in spleen sections from ENU-leukemia mice of (A) JAK2 (green) and p-JAK2 (red) staining, showing higher levels of JAK2 phosphorylation in ENU-leukemia mice compared to control mice., (B) STAT3 (green) and p-STAT3 (red) staining, indicating enhanced STAT3 signaling in ENU-leukemia mice compared to control mice. Scale bar= 50 µm, Magnification= 400 ×.
![Figure 7 Immunofluorescence analysis of proteins in the JAK-STAT pathway in spleen sections from ENU-leukemia mice of (A) JAK2 (green) and p-JAK2 (red) staining, showing higher levels of JAK2 phosphorylation in ENU-leukemia mice compared to control mice., (B) STAT3 (green) and p-STAT3 (red) staining, indicating enhanced STAT3 signaling in ENU-leukemia mice compared to control mice. Scale bar= 50 µm, Magnification= 400 ×.](/cms/asset/f833f327-0f16-4bcb-8402-5d9282e2555b/djir_a_12300318_f0007_c.jpg)
Figure 8 Effect of ICT on apoptosis markers in ENU-induced leukemic mice (A) BCL-2; (B) BAX in spleen and liver. Immunohistochemistry results show protein distribution of Bax in (C) spleen and (D) liver. Data are mean ± SD (n = 6). *P < 0.01 vs normal control, #P < 0.01 vs Leukemic group. Scale bar= 50 µm, Magnification= 400 ×.
![Figure 8 Effect of ICT on apoptosis markers in ENU-induced leukemic mice (A) BCL-2; (B) BAX in spleen and liver. Immunohistochemistry results show protein distribution of Bax in (C) spleen and (D) liver. Data are mean ± SD (n = 6). *P < 0.01 vs normal control, #P < 0.01 vs Leukemic group. Scale bar= 50 µm, Magnification= 400 ×.](/cms/asset/3319387d-a5c2-4f47-b495-8a466e199bef/djir_a_12300318_f0008_c.jpg)