Effects of plain packaging on decision-making and reward for nicotine cigarettes

Figures & data

Table 1 Behavioral studies of plain packing of cigarettes

Study	Year	Methods	n	Included nonsmokers	Country
Arora et al^Citation37^·*	2013	Focus group/survey	124/346	Yes	India
Bansal-Travers et al^Citation21	2011	Forced choice	397	Yes	United States
Fix et al^Citation38	2011	Survey	678	No	United States
Gallopel-Morvan et al^Citation25	2012	Forced choice	836	Yes	France
Germain et al^Citation6	2010	Rate pack	1,087	Yes	Australia
Goldberg et al^Citation31	1999	Recall	401	No	Canada
Hammond et al^Citation7	2013	Rate pack	947	Yes	United Kingdom
Hammond et al^Citation22**	2009	Forced choice	806/516	Yes	United Kingdom
Hammond et al^Citation23	2011	Rate pack	826	Yes	United States
Hammond et al^Citation24	2013	Forced choice	712	Yes	United Kingdom
Hoek et al^Citation18	2012	Focus group	86	Yes	New Zealand
Hoek et al^Citation40	2011	Forced choice	292	No	New Zealand
Lund and Scheffels^Citation8	2013	Rate pack	1,022	Yes	Norway
Maynard et al^Citation33	2013	Eye tracking	87	Yes	United Kingdom
McCool et al^Citation9	2012	Focus group	80	Yes	New Zealand
Moodie et al^Citation35	2012	Forced choice	658	Yes	United Kingdom
Moodie et al^Citation20	2011	Naturalistic	140	No	United Kingdom
Moodie and Mackintosh^Citation36	2013	Naturalistic	301	No	United Kingdom
Munafo et al^Citation34	2011	Eye tracker	43	Yes	United Kingdom
Scheffels and Lund^Citation16	2013	Forced choice/rate pack	1,010	Yes	Norway
Scheffels and Sæbo^Citation17	2013	Focus group	69	Yes	Norway
Thrasher et al^Citation14	2011	Bidding	404	No	United States
Wakefield et al^Citation15	2012	Rate pack	1,203	No	Australia
Wakefield et al^Citation19	2008	Rate pack	813	No	Australia
Wakefield et al^Citation39	2013	Naturalistic	536	No	Australia
White et al^Citation10	2012	Rate pack	640	Yes	Brazil

Notes: *Included two studies – a focus group (n=124) and a survey (n=346); **included a sample of adults (n=806) and adolescents (n=516).

Arora M, Tewari A, Grills N, et al. Exploring perception of Indians about plain packaging of tobacco products: a mixed method research. Front Public Health. 2013;1:35.

 PubMedGoogle Scholar

Bansal-Travers M, Hammond D, Smith P, Cummings KM. The impact of cigarette pack design, descriptors, and warning labels on risk perception in the US. Am J Prev Med. 2011;40(6):674–682.

 PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar

Fix BV, O’Connor RJ, Fong GT, Borland R, Cummings KM, Hyland A. Smokers’ reactions to FDA regulation of tobacco products: findings from the 2009 ITC United States survey. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:941.

 PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar

Gallopel-Morvan K, Moodie C, Hammond D, Eker F, Beguinot E, Martinet Y. Consumer perceptions of cigarette pack design in France: a comparison of regular, limited edition and plain packaging. Tob Control. 2012;21(5):502–506.

 PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar

Germain D, Wakefield MA, Durkin SJ. Adolescents’ perceptions of cigarette brand image: does plain packaging make a difference?J Adolesc Health. 2010;46(4):385–392.

 Google Scholar

Goldberg ME, Liefeld J, Madill J, Vredenburg H. The effect of plain packaging on response to health warnings. Am J Public Health. 1999;89(9):1434–1435.

 PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar

Hammond D, Daniel S, White CM. The effect of cigarette branding and plain packaging on female youth in the United Kingdom. J Adolesc Health. 2013;52(2):151–157.

 PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar

Hammond D, Dockrell M, Arnott D, Lee A, McNeill A. Cigarette pack design and perceptions of risk among UK adults and youth. Eur J Public Health. 2009;19(6):631–637.

 PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar

Hammond D, Doxey J, Daniel S, Bansal-Travers M. Impact of female-oriented cigarette packaging in the United States. Nicotine Tob Res. 2011;13(7):579–588.

 PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar

Hammond D, White C, Anderson W, Arnott D, Dockrell M. The perceptions of UK youth of branded and standardized, ‘plain’ cigarette packaging. Eur J Public Health. Epub October 8, 2013.

 Google Scholar

Hoek J, Gendall P, Gifford H, et al. Tobacco branding, plain packaging, pictorial warnings, and symbolic consumption. Qual Health Res. 2012;22(5):630–639.

 PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar

Hoek J, Wong C, Gendall P, Louviere J, Cong K. Effects of dissuasive packaging on young adult smokers. Tob Control. 2011;20(3):183–188.

 PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar

Lund I, Scheffels J. Young smokers and non-smokers perceptions of typical users of plain vs branded cigarette packs: a between-subjects experimental survey. BMC Public Health. 2013;13(1):1005.

 PubMedGoogle Scholar

Maynard OM, Munafò MR, Leonards U. Visual attention to health warnings on plain tobacco packaging in adolescent smokers and non-smokers. Addiction. 2013;108(2):413–419.

 PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar

McCool J, Webb L, Cameron LD, Hoek J. Graphic warning labels on plain cigarette packs: will they make a difference to adolescents? Soc Sci Med. 2012;74(8):1269–1273.

 PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar

Moodie C, Mackintosh AM, Hastings G, Ford A. Young adult smokers’ perceptions of plain packaging: a pilot naturalistic study. Tob Control. 2011;20(5):367–373.

 PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar

Moodie C, Ford A, Mackintosh AM, Hastings G. Young people’s perceptions of cigarette packaging and plain packaging: an online survey. Nicotine Tob Res. 2012;14(1):98–105.

 PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar

Moodie CS, Mackintosh AM. Young adult women smokers’ response to using plain cigarette packaging: a naturalistic approach. BMJ Open. 2013;3(3).

 Web of Science ®Google Scholar

Munafò MR, Roberts N, Bauld L, Leonards U. Plain packaging increases visual attention to health warnings on cigarette packs in non-smokers and weekly smokers but not daily smokers. Addiction. 2011;106(8):1505–1510.

 PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar

Scheffels J, Lund I. The impact of cigarette branding and plain packaging on perceptions of product appeal and risk among young adults in Norway: a between-subjects experimental survey. BMJ Open. 2013;3(12):e003732.

 PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar

Scheffels J, Sæbø G. Perceptions of plain and branded cigarette packaging among Norwegian youth and adults: a focus group study. Nicotine Tob Res. 2013;15(2):450–456.

 PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar

Thrasher JF, Rousu MC, Hammond D, Navarro A, Corrigan JR. Estimating the impact of pictorial health warnings and “plain” cigarette packaging: evidence from experimental auctions among adult smokers in the United States. Health Policy. 2011;102(1):41–48.

 PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar

Wakefield M, Germain D, Durkin S, Hammond D, Goldberg M, Borland R. Do larger pictorial health warnings diminish the need for plain packaging of cigarettes? Addiction. 2012;107(6):1159–1167.

 PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar

Wakefield MA, Germain D, Durkin SJ. How does increasingly plainer cigarette packaging influence adult smokers’ perceptions about brand image? An experimental study. Tob Control. 2008;17(6):416–421.

 PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar

Wakefield MA, Hayes L, Durkin S, Borland R. Introduction effects of the Australian plain packaging policy on adult smokers: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2013;3(7).

 PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar

White CM, Hammond D, Thrasher JF, Fong GT. The potential impact of plain packaging of cigarette products among Brazilian young women: an experimental study. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:737.

 PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar