Figures & data
Table 1 Cosmetic Use of Various Nano-Delivery Systems and Their BenefitsCitation40
Table 2 Potential Functional Groups Were Identified Using Fourier Transform Infrared Spectrometry (FTIR) in Bulbine Frutescens Extracts and Synthesized Gold Nanoparticles (AuNPs)
Figure 1 (A) Fourier-transform infrared spectrometry (FTIR) of the freeze-dried leaf juice extract (BFE) and synthesized gold nanoparticles (BFEAuNPs), (B) high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) and (C) selected area diffraction pattern (SAED).
![Figure 1 (A) Fourier-transform infrared spectrometry (FTIR) of the freeze-dried leaf juice extract (BFE) and synthesized gold nanoparticles (BFEAuNPs), (B) high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) and (C) selected area diffraction pattern (SAED).](/cms/asset/a8b050b0-f0c0-4334-8913-5ab1e31a4dcf/dnsa_a_12301229_f0001_c.jpg)
Figure 2 (A) Fourier-transform infrared spectrometry (FTIR) of the ethanolic whole leaf extract (BFE+) and synthesized gold nanoparticles (BFE+AuNPs), (B) high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) and (C) selected area diffraction pattern (SAED).
![Figure 2 (A) Fourier-transform infrared spectrometry (FTIR) of the ethanolic whole leaf extract (BFE+) and synthesized gold nanoparticles (BFE+AuNPs), (B) high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) and (C) selected area diffraction pattern (SAED).](/cms/asset/b2e6aefb-6c97-4759-bc73-eebe52b60fd3/dnsa_a_12301229_f0002_c.jpg)
Figure 3 (A) Fourier-transform infrared spectrometry (FTIR) of the gel extract (BFG) and synthesized gold nanoparticles (BFGAuNPs), (B) high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) and (C) selected area diffraction pattern (SAED).
![Figure 3 (A) Fourier-transform infrared spectrometry (FTIR) of the gel extract (BFG) and synthesized gold nanoparticles (BFGAuNPs), (B) high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) and (C) selected area diffraction pattern (SAED).](/cms/asset/f0ceda84-f8f8-4be2-a4e8-60b1484f881d/dnsa_a_12301229_f0003_c.jpg)
Figure 4 (A) Fourier-transform infrared spectrometry (FTIR) of the preserved leaf juice solution (BFS) and synthesized gold nanoparticles (BFSAuNPs), (B) high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) and (C) selected area diffraction pattern (SAED).
![Figure 4 (A) Fourier-transform infrared spectrometry (FTIR) of the preserved leaf juice solution (BFS) and synthesized gold nanoparticles (BFSAuNPs), (B) high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) and (C) selected area diffraction pattern (SAED).](/cms/asset/1c362db4-7a59-485f-bab0-b1bdd806282e/dnsa_a_12301229_f0004_c.jpg)
Figure 5 In vitro stability of Bulbine frutescens freeze-dried leaf juice synthesized gold nanoparticles (BFEAuNPs) in (A) Roswell Park Memorial Institution (RPMI-1640) media, (B) Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s media (DMEM), (C) 5% sodium chloride (NaCl), (D) pH of 4, (E) 7 and (F) 10 and (G) 0.5% bovine serum albumin (BSA).
![Figure 5 In vitro stability of Bulbine frutescens freeze-dried leaf juice synthesized gold nanoparticles (BFEAuNPs) in (A) Roswell Park Memorial Institution (RPMI-1640) media, (B) Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s media (DMEM), (C) 5% sodium chloride (NaCl), (D) pH of 4, (E) 7 and (F) 10 and (G) 0.5% bovine serum albumin (BSA).](/cms/asset/865233df-4a4e-47e0-84b5-1c60f779452e/dnsa_a_12301229_f0005_c.jpg)
Figure 6 In vitro stability of Bulbine frutescens ethanolic whole leaf synthesized gold nanoparticles (BFE+AuNPs) in (A) Roswell Park Memorial Institution (RPMI-1640) media, (B) Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s media (DMEM), (C) 5% sodium chloride (NaCl), (D) pH of 4, (E) 7 and (F) 10 and (G) 0.5% bovine serum albumin (BSA).
![Figure 6 In vitro stability of Bulbine frutescens ethanolic whole leaf synthesized gold nanoparticles (BFE+AuNPs) in (A) Roswell Park Memorial Institution (RPMI-1640) media, (B) Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s media (DMEM), (C) 5% sodium chloride (NaCl), (D) pH of 4, (E) 7 and (F) 10 and (G) 0.5% bovine serum albumin (BSA).](/cms/asset/af33e0c9-f87a-490e-8988-18ada6f5a791/dnsa_a_12301229_f0006_c.jpg)
Figure 7 In vitro stability of Bulbine frutescens gel synthesized gold nanoparticles (BFGAuNPs) in (A) Roswell Park Memorial Institution (RPMI-1640) media, (B) Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s media (DMEM), (C) 5% sodium chloride (NaCl), (D) pH of 4, (E) 7 and (F) 10 and (G) 0.5% bovine serum albumin (BSA).
![Figure 7 In vitro stability of Bulbine frutescens gel synthesized gold nanoparticles (BFGAuNPs) in (A) Roswell Park Memorial Institution (RPMI-1640) media, (B) Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s media (DMEM), (C) 5% sodium chloride (NaCl), (D) pH of 4, (E) 7 and (F) 10 and (G) 0.5% bovine serum albumin (BSA).](/cms/asset/29614aab-4e71-44bf-8953-b4cc8725d2e3/dnsa_a_12301229_f0007_c.jpg)
Figure 8 In vitro stability of Bulbine frutescens preserved leaf juice synthesized gold nanoparticles (BFSAuNPs) in (A) Roswell Park Memorial Institution (RPMI-1640) media, (B) Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s media (DMEM), (C) 5% sodium chloride (NaCl), (D) pH of 4, (E) 7 and (F) 10 and (G) 0.5% bovine serum albumin (BSA).
![Figure 8 In vitro stability of Bulbine frutescens preserved leaf juice synthesized gold nanoparticles (BFSAuNPs) in (A) Roswell Park Memorial Institution (RPMI-1640) media, (B) Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s media (DMEM), (C) 5% sodium chloride (NaCl), (D) pH of 4, (E) 7 and (F) 10 and (G) 0.5% bovine serum albumin (BSA).](/cms/asset/bb1601f2-71cd-468f-a9dd-22d8b3ce7c89/dnsa_a_12301229_f0008_c.jpg)
Figure 9 Cell viability of (A) BF freeze-dried leaf juice (BFE), ethanolic whole leaf (BFE+) and gel extract (BFG), (B) BF freeze-dried leaf juice synthesized gold nanoparticle (BFEAuNPs) and ethanolic whole leaf synthesized gold nanoparticle (BFE+AuNPs) solutions at a concentration of 400–50 µg/mL and (C) BF preserved leaf juice (BFS), preserved leaf juice synthesized gold nanoparticle (BFSAuNPs) solutions at a concentration of 2 and 1% and gel synthesized gold nanoparticle (BFGAuNPs) solution at 10 and 5% on wound stimulated human keratinocyte (HaCaT) cells. Data represents mean ± SEM (n=2). A significant difference was determined using a one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison test, where p < 0.01 (**) and p < 0.001 (***) indicate significance when compared to the vehicle (0.5% DMSO) and water control (+).
![Figure 9 Cell viability of (A) BF freeze-dried leaf juice (BFE), ethanolic whole leaf (BFE+) and gel extract (BFG), (B) BF freeze-dried leaf juice synthesized gold nanoparticle (BFEAuNPs) and ethanolic whole leaf synthesized gold nanoparticle (BFE+AuNPs) solutions at a concentration of 400–50 µg/mL and (C) BF preserved leaf juice (BFS), preserved leaf juice synthesized gold nanoparticle (BFSAuNPs) solutions at a concentration of 2 and 1% and gel synthesized gold nanoparticle (BFGAuNPs) solution at 10 and 5% on wound stimulated human keratinocyte (HaCaT) cells. Data represents mean ± SEM (n=2). A significant difference was determined using a one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison test, where p < 0.01 (**) and p < 0.001 (***) indicate significance when compared to the vehicle (0.5% DMSO) and water control (+).](/cms/asset/3357bef3-1996-4c37-8475-70023dc3fda5/dnsa_a_12301229_f0009_c.jpg)
Figure 10 Percentage wound closure of (A) BF freeze-dried leaf juice (BFE), ethanolic whole leaf (BFE+) and gel extract (BFG) at 100 and 50 µg/mL, (B) BF freeze-dried leaf juice synthesized gold nanoparticle (BFEAuNPs) and ethanolic whole leaf synthesized gold nanoparticle (BFE+AuNPs) solutions at 100 and 50 µg/mL and (C) BF preserved leaf juice (BFS), preserved leaf juice synthesized gold nanoparticles (BFSAuNPs) at 2 and 1% and gel synthesized gold nanoparticles (BFGAuNPs) at 10 and 5% on human keratinocyte (HaCaT) cells. Data is represented as mean ± SEM (n=2) Significant difference was determined using a one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison test, where p < 0.05 (*), p < 0.01 (**) and p < 0.001 (***) indicate significance when compared to the vehicle (0.5% DMSO) control or the untreated control (+).
![Figure 10 Percentage wound closure of (A) BF freeze-dried leaf juice (BFE), ethanolic whole leaf (BFE+) and gel extract (BFG) at 100 and 50 µg/mL, (B) BF freeze-dried leaf juice synthesized gold nanoparticle (BFEAuNPs) and ethanolic whole leaf synthesized gold nanoparticle (BFE+AuNPs) solutions at 100 and 50 µg/mL and (C) BF preserved leaf juice (BFS), preserved leaf juice synthesized gold nanoparticles (BFSAuNPs) at 2 and 1% and gel synthesized gold nanoparticles (BFGAuNPs) at 10 and 5% on human keratinocyte (HaCaT) cells. Data is represented as mean ± SEM (n=2) Significant difference was determined using a one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison test, where p < 0.05 (*), p < 0.01 (**) and p < 0.001 (***) indicate significance when compared to the vehicle (0.5% DMSO) control or the untreated control (+).](/cms/asset/cac943bb-f789-411c-ab1b-f02158e1b60e/dnsa_a_12301229_f0010_c.jpg)
Figure 11 Cell viability of the freeze-dried leaf juice (BFE) extract and synthesized gold nanoparticles using the freeze-dried leaf juice (BFEAuNPs) at a concentration of 200, 100 and 50 µg/mL on phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) stimulated granulocytes. Data represents mean ± SEM (n=2). A significant difference was determined using a one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison test when compared to either the untreated (media with PMA) or 0.25% DMSO (vehicle) control (+).
![Figure 11 Cell viability of the freeze-dried leaf juice (BFE) extract and synthesized gold nanoparticles using the freeze-dried leaf juice (BFEAuNPs) at a concentration of 200, 100 and 50 µg/mL on phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) stimulated granulocytes. Data represents mean ± SEM (n=2). A significant difference was determined using a one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison test when compared to either the untreated (media with PMA) or 0.25% DMSO (vehicle) control (+).](/cms/asset/86abfaf4-5232-43ab-b90e-7855667610a6/dnsa_a_12301229_f0011_c.jpg)
Figure 12 Histamine production of (A) BF freeze-dried leaf juice extracts (BFE) and (B) BF freeze-dried leaf juice synthesized gold nanoparticles (BFEAuNPs) at a concentration of 200, 100 and 50 µg/mL using phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) stimulated granulocytes. Data represents mean ± SEM (n=2). Significant difference was determined using a one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison test, where p < 0.05 (*), p < 0.01 (**) and p < 0.001 (***) indicate significance when compared to either the 0.25% DMSO (vehicle) or untreated (media) control (+).
![Figure 12 Histamine production of (A) BF freeze-dried leaf juice extracts (BFE) and (B) BF freeze-dried leaf juice synthesized gold nanoparticles (BFEAuNPs) at a concentration of 200, 100 and 50 µg/mL using phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) stimulated granulocytes. Data represents mean ± SEM (n=2). Significant difference was determined using a one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison test, where p < 0.05 (*), p < 0.01 (**) and p < 0.001 (***) indicate significance when compared to either the 0.25% DMSO (vehicle) or untreated (media) control (+).](/cms/asset/86e99c00-1a8f-4ed2-a7c1-30b2d1296f4d/dnsa_a_12301229_f0012_c.jpg)