Figures & data
Figure 1 Image of anterior segment obtained with the Sirius® Scheimpflug device.
![Figure 1 Image of anterior segment obtained with the Sirius® Scheimpflug device.](/cms/asset/8810fb3a-703e-49d5-938e-1e43dc57ae92/doph_a_35121_f0001_b.jpg)
Figure 2 Bland-Altman analysis of CCT values measured by ultrasound and Sirius®. Abbreviation: CCT, central corneal thickness.
![Figure 2 Bland-Altman analysis of CCT values measured by ultrasound and Sirius®. Abbreviation: CCT, central corneal thickness.](/cms/asset/172186da-1e82-4a1f-8664-6411a09fdaa4/doph_a_35121_f0002_b.jpg)
Figure 3 Bland-Altman analysis of ACD values measured with ultrasound biometry and Sirius® device.
![Figure 3 Bland-Altman analysis of ACD values measured with ultrasound biometry and Sirius® device.](/cms/asset/2e2bf406-e2ca-4306-8e61-4e8ebfe5c5ca/doph_a_35121_f0003_b.jpg)
Table 1 Average values and standard deviation for central corneal thickness and anterior chamber depth measurements obtained with the ultrasound devices and Sirius® for three runs of measurements
Table 2 Average values, standard deviation, and range for central corneal thickness and anterior chamber depth measurements obtained with ultrasound and the Sirius®
Figure 4 Bland-Altman analysis of ACD values measured with ultrasound biometry and Sirius® device by adding the value of CCT to the Sirius ACD value.
![Figure 4 Bland-Altman analysis of ACD values measured with ultrasound biometry and Sirius® device by adding the value of CCT to the Sirius ACD value.](/cms/asset/0a4eca27-7339-46b7-a45d-e8fb6088b030/doph_a_35121_f0004_b.jpg)
Figure 5 Bland-Altman analysis of ACD values measured with ultrasound biometry subtracting the value of CCT from the ultrasound biometric measure and Sirius® device.
![Figure 5 Bland-Altman analysis of ACD values measured with ultrasound biometry subtracting the value of CCT from the ultrasound biometric measure and Sirius® device.](/cms/asset/42146948-fc6d-488a-b51f-aee24c3592c5/doph_a_35121_f0005_b.jpg)
Table 3 Mean difference, standard deviation, level of statistical significance, and limits of agreement between each set of measurement techniques to be compared at the 95% confidence interval