55
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Targeted treatments in advanced renal cell carcinoma: focus on axitinib

, , , , , , & show all
Pages 107-116 | Published online: 27 Mar 2014

Figures & data

Figure 1 Chemical structure of axitinib.

Figure 1 Chemical structure of axitinib.

Table 1 IC50 values determined by receptor phosphorylation assays

Figure 2 Mean steady-state plasma concentrations on day 15 of dosing (maximum concentration versus dose).

Note: Patson B, Cohen RB, Olszanski AJ, Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology, 8(2):259–270.Citation30 Copyright © 2012, informa Healthcare. Reproduced with permission of informa Healthcare.
Abbreviations: bid, twice daily; qd, once daily; Cmax, maximum concentration.
Figure 2 Mean steady-state plasma concentrations on day 15 of dosing (maximum concentration versus dose).

Table 2 Main CYP 3A4 inducers

Figure 3 Maximum percentage tumor decrease of target lesions by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors.

Notes: Bars represent individual patients. Zero represents baseline (no change); −100% represents potential complete response; greater than −30% represents potential partial response. Excludes four patients who progressed without post-baseline scans. Reprinted from The Lancet Oncology, vol 8, Rixe O, Bukowski RM, Michaelson MD, et al, Axitinib treatment in patients with cytokine-refractory metastatic renal-cell cancer: a phase II study, Pages 975–984,Citation42 Copyright © 2014, with permission from Elsevier.
Figure 3 Maximum percentage tumor decrease of target lesions by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors.

Figure 4 Kaplan–Meier estimated median progression-free survival in patients who received axitinib or sorafenib as second-line therapy for metastatic renal cell cancer. (A) All patients, (B) patients previously treated with cytokine-based regimen, and (C) patients previously treated with sunitinib-based regimen (full analysis set, by independent review committee assessment).

Note: P-values based on one-sided, stratified log-rank test. Reprinted from The Lancet, Vol 378, Rini BI, Escudier B, Tomczak P, et al, Comparative effectiveness of axitinib versus sorafenib in advanced renal cell carcinoma (AXIS): a randomised phase 3 trial, Pages 1931–1939,Citation28 Copyright © 2011, with permission from Elsevier.
Abbreviations: HR, hazard ratio; PFS, progression-free survival; CI, confidence interval.
Figure 4 Kaplan–Meier estimated median progression-free survival in patients who received axitinib or sorafenib as second-line therapy for metastatic renal cell cancer. (A) All patients, (B) patients previously treated with cytokine-based regimen, and (C) patients previously treated with sunitinib-based regimen (full analysis set, by independent review committee assessment).

Table 3 Treatment-related adverse events in AGiLe 1046