228
Views
23
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Development and validation of a revised instrument to measure burden of long-term medicines use: the Living with Medicines Questionnaire version 3

, &
Pages 155-168 | Published online: 28 May 2018

Figures & data

Figure 1 Flow diagrams illustrating respondent numbers in each stage of the study.

Abbreviations: LMQ, Living with Medicines Questionnaire; EFA, exploratory factor analyses; CFA, confirmatory factor analyses; KARU; Kent Adult Research Unit.
Figure 1 Flow diagrams illustrating respondent numbers in each stage of the study.

Table 1 Characteristics of study participants

Table 2 EFA-derived factor structure of the LMQ-3 (N=366)

Figure 2 Hierarchical CFA model for the 41-item Living with Medicines Questionnaire version 3.

Notes: Standardized path estimates are shown.
Abbreviations: CFA, confirmatory factor analyses; Int, interferences with day-to-day life; SideE, side effects; Conc, general concerns about medicines; Effec, lack of effectiveness; Prac, practical difficulties; Relat, patient–doctor relationships and communication about medicines; Cost, cost-related burden; Auto, lack of autonomy/control over medicine use; e1–e41 = variance associated each item; eI–eA represent variance associated with each of the eight factors or domains (interferences to autonomy respectively); Q, question.
Figure 2 Hierarchical CFA model for the 41-item Living with Medicines Questionnaire version 3.

Table 3 Correlations between domains of the LMQ-3 and TSQM-II subscales

Table 4 Known-groups validity of the LMQ-3

Figure 3 Number of missing responses to LMQ questions.

Abbreviations: LMQ, Living with Medicines Questionnaire; Q, question.
Figure 3 Number of missing responses to LMQ questions.

Table 5 Items with more than 2% missing data in Stage 2

Table 6 Differences between full and partial respondents of LMQ-3 in Stage 2