68
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Methodology

Cost-Effective 3D Printing of Custom Vascular Models in Vascular and Interventional Radiology

, , &
Pages 7-14 | Received 30 Sep 2017, Accepted 07 Nov 2017, Published online: 15 Dec 2017

Figures & data

Table 1. Overview of several common 3D printing methods.

Table 2. An affordable desktop printer Form 2 (Formlabs) was used for our project. More expensive printers with larger build volumes, better resolution and/or greater material flexibility might be found in a large hospital 3D lab.

Figure 1. CT data segmentation using Mimics InPrint 2.0.

Color-coded segments (bottom right) were virtually cut to fit our printer's build volume.

Figure 1. CT data segmentation using Mimics InPrint 2.0.Color-coded segments (bottom right) were virtually cut to fit our printer's build volume.
Figure 2. Form 2 (Formlabs), a stereolithography printer was used.

STL files manipulated using Form 2's CAD software for placement within the printer 3D build volume. Two separate prints of 8–12 h each were required to print all model parts.

CAD: Computer-aided design; STL: Standard Tessellation Language.

Figure 2. Form 2 (Formlabs), a stereolithography printer was used.STL files manipulated using Form 2's CAD software for placement within the printer 3D build volume. Two separate prints of 8–12 h each were required to print all model parts.CAD: Computer-aided design; STL: Standard Tessellation Language.
Figure 3. Summary of cost and time requirements.
Figure 3. Summary of cost and time requirements.
Figure 4. Printed material was separated from the printer base and support scaffolding peeled off.

Parts were washed in isopropyl alcohol solution to remove uncured resin from the model surface. The components were fused by painting liquid resin onto the joints, and curing with a handheld UV laser (A). The model was filled with water and vascular access sheaths were secured (B).

Figure 4. Printed material was separated from the printer base and support scaffolding peeled off.Parts were washed in isopropyl alcohol solution to remove uncured resin from the model surface. The components were fused by painting liquid resin onto the joints, and curing with a handheld UV laser (A). The model was filled with water and vascular access sheaths were secured (B).
Figure 5. Completed arterial prototype.
Figure 5. Completed arterial prototype.
Figure 6. 3D printed model used for endovascular simulation.

A resident practicing catheter skills (A), with corresponding fluoroscopic image of the training model (B).

Figure 6. 3D printed model used for endovascular simulation.A resident practicing catheter skills (A), with corresponding fluoroscopic image of the training model (B).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.