457
Views
22
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

The efficacy of attention bias modification therapy in cocaine use disorders

, PhD, , MD, , MS, , BS, , MD, , PhD & , MD show all
Pages 459-468 | Received 19 Nov 2015, Accepted 03 Feb 2016, Published online: 16 May 2016
 

ABSTRACT

Background: Attentional bias (i.e., differences in reaction time between drug and neutral cues) has been associated with a variety of drug-use behaviors (e.g., craving, abstinence). Reduction of bias may ultimately reduce use. Objective: The current study examined whether attentional bias modification therapy (ABMT) reduced the frequency of drug use behaviors in individuals with cocaine use disorder (CUD). Method: Participants (n = 37) were randomly assigned to ABMT or control therapy, which systematically varied how frequently probes replaced neutral (ABMT = 100%; control therapy = 50%) relative to drug stimuli. Each intervention included 5 training sessions comprising a total of 2640 trials over 4 weeks. Clinical assessments occurred at baseline, post-intervention, 2 weeks and 3 months posttreatment. Results: There were no baseline differences between groups on drug-use behaviors or other clinical measures. Contrary to predictions, both groups exhibited slower rather than faster reaction times for cocaine stimuli (p = 0.005) at baseline, with no relationship between bias and baseline measures of drug-use behavior. Conclusions: ABMT was not more effective than our control therapy at reducing attentional bias, reducing craving or changing other drug use behaviors. Current results suggest additional replication studies are needed to assess ABMT’s efficacy in reducing drug-use behaviors in CUD.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Cathy Smith and Diana South for their assistance with data collection, and Marion Cook for her help with the literature search.

Funding

This research was supported by a grant [grant number NIH 01 R21 DA031380] from the National Institute of Drug Abuse to Andrew Mayer.

Declaration of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Funding

This research was supported by a grant [grant number NIH 01 R21 DA031380] from the National Institute of Drug Abuse to Andrew Mayer.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 987.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.